Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Heading for a fall?
The Washington Times ^ | 5-10-06 | Bruce Bartlett

Posted on 05/10/2006 12:25:52 PM PDT by JZelle

My new book, "Impostor," is very critical of President Bush for not standing up for conservative principles. One of the main criticisms I have heard is that Republicans in Congress deserve much of the blame for out-of-control spending and other sins I blame on him. This is a valid point. But I take the view members of Congress will always behave myopically, seeing spending that benefits their constituents as supremely virtuous even as they decry deficits and bloated budgets.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtontimes.com ...


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: brucebartlett; cino; democrats; house; imposter; rino; seante; speakerpelosi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 05/10/2006 12:25:55 PM PDT by JZelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Read my lips: Bush is not a conservative!


2 posted on 05/10/2006 12:28:46 PM PDT by Joe Bfstplk (I am going to be assertive...If that is OK with you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bfstplk
Read my lips: Bush is not a conservative!

And he still almost lost to Gore.

3 posted on 05/10/2006 12:29:49 PM PDT by rhombus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
For all the "sky if falling" talk about federal spending (and let me note, it most certainly pisses me off from time to time)...the reality is as a % of the economy spending today is lower then the average federal gov't spending for the past 30 years -

And I'm not simply talking about the deficit as a % of GDP (which again, is rather low).....but of actual federal spending. I read through a CATO institute report last week while traveling and it showed the actual federal spending today as a % of the economy is lower then what our average spending has been for the past 30 years -

With that said, it doesn't mean spending isn't too high. It most certainly is...and even more so on a State and local levels (gov't wise). But I really hope our GOP base comes together this Nov and does not knife our soldiers in the back while they are overseas by helping to put into power the ilk of the anti-military, anti-America, anti-success in the WOT Democrats into a majority in Congress.

4 posted on 05/10/2006 12:31:15 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
Bartlett is another disgruntle paleocon.
5 posted on 05/10/2006 12:34:21 PM PDT by Perdogg (entia non sunt multiplicanda praeter necessitatem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: Joe Bfstplk
Read my lips: Bush is not a conservative!

Nor was Reagan then - Amnesty to over 3 million illegal immigrants (when the problem was at a much more manageable level) - Increased FICA taxes on all Americans, thus enslaving another generation into a wealth stealing gov't system - Appointed two terrible SCOTUS justices, with SDO simply being appointed because she was a women - Left our warriors out to dry by running from Bruit - Federal spending increased (and only guaranteed the need for future increases in the years ahead by not addressing Soc Sec reform) -

But no....Ronald Reagan was most certainly a conservative (as is GWB) he was a also a very good man and a d*mn fine POTUS.....just as is GWB.

GWB is a man of tremendous character and of quiet resolve that is sourly missing among men today. In fact is is mocked instead of admired by far too many.

That some on the right cannot overlook a few disagreements is simply a reflection of those people...not a negative reflection whatsoever on this fine CIC.

7 posted on 05/10/2006 12:37:16 PM PDT by SevenMinusOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JZelle

Bartlett's main criticisms of Bush fall into these categories:

Stem cell research (Bartlett's apparently for it).

Abortion (Bartlett thinks Bush is too pro-life).

Social Security (Bartlett thinks privatizing Social Security is a mistake).

And the war, which Bartlett thinks is a mistake.

So far, I agree with Bush. It could all be done better, but I don't know yet by who.


8 posted on 05/10/2006 12:43:01 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Bfstplk
Conservatives are NOT a monolithic group, and you do not hold the power to declare who is and is not a Conservative!

LLS
9 posted on 05/10/2006 12:54:45 PM PDT by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

Hope GWB does not pave the way for HRC.


10 posted on 05/10/2006 12:57:50 PM PDT by luvbach1 (More true now than ever: Near the belly of the beast in San Diego)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: DevSix
Ronald Reagan signed the 1986 Tax Reform.

He raised corporate taxes and found his way to a Germany cemetary with Kohl, where SS were honored.

In the end Reagan allowed far more discretionary spending than this President has done to this day.

I'll honor George W Bush for every single aspect of his compassionate heart and his steadfast devotion to protection America and the rest of the civilized world from the barbarians.

11 posted on 05/10/2006 1:04:52 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: JZelle
Do not think of Bush as an impostor; but rather a man of genuine integrity and humility in his assumption of power. If you want to talk real 'sins'. . .I think of the treasonous decisions committed by a prior Administration; their many 'sins' of abuse of power; and how that impacted George Bush's job in Washington.

I think of a President burdened with the 'sins' of an enemy who war against us without a burden of conscience, whatsoever. . .

I think of how President Bush, like no other; has been abused by the 'sins' of 'the Left' including the MSM. . .a Left by the way, who, like our foreeign enemies. . .carry no burden of conscience and hold to no 'code of honor', by their recognizing only the Utilitarian model - end justifies any means- to accomplish their goals.

This President could not possibly please every Conservative. . .or Libertarian; and surely not every Republican; but in light of the 'sins' committed against him; I would rather stand with this President and appreciate - in light and in spite, of his opposition; foreign and domestic. . .and drink a 'glass more than half full'. . .rather than damn him for an empty cup.

So what is the desired goal or answer here to your writing this book. . .for more voters to support a Demrat in the next election. . .ANY election (?). . .

. . .or is our reading this meant to send a message to ourselves and be all the sorrier for it, if we literally 'buy' it.

12 posted on 05/10/2006 1:07:24 PM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal-free. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DevSix

bttt


13 posted on 05/10/2006 1:09:18 PM PDT by petercooper (Cemeteries & the ignorant - comprising 2 of the largest Democrat voting blocs for the past 75 years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: petercooper
Cemeteries & the ignorant - comprising 2 of the largest Democrat voting blocs for the past 75 years.

LOL; albeit painfully true. . .(a great tagline)

14 posted on 05/10/2006 1:26:45 PM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal-free. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
"In the end Reagan allowed far more discretionary spending than this President has done to this day."

Disc. Spending under reagan was cut by a net 1 or 2 percent.

Can Bush say the same?
15 posted on 05/10/2006 1:31:32 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: cricket
I bust GWB ass when ever possible when he deserves it. But at the end of the day I stand behind the president I helped elect. What ever anyone including my self bemoans about him, as far as history goes he will be one of our greatest presidents ever. What some need to remember is that just because we criticize him dose not mean we want to dump him or are some how rooting for the democrats. What we are doing is saying our leader is of course (on spending and immigration) and needs a correction. If we don't let him know who will?
16 posted on 05/10/2006 1:35:45 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86
Reagan spent one and one half times more than came into the treasury.

Some cut!

17 posted on 05/10/2006 1:47:08 PM PDT by OldFriend (I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: spikeytx86
If we don't let him know who will?

The world is on this man's case; against every breath he takes. And of course, there is 'honest criticism' within a Party and it's members. . .and there is real betrayal. . .

We have way too many Repubs 'bahwahing' over Bush's leadership. . .which I can honestly criticize myself. . .; but the line has been crossed when our Repub leadership is afraid to stand with President Bush and imagine their politcal careers are safer if they stand against him. . .rather than with him, because of these railing voices.

And a line has been crossed when the dissenting Repubs; by virtue of their attacks/criticisms, aid and abett our own political enemies here at home.

18 posted on 05/10/2006 1:52:09 PM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal-free. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: luvbach1
Hope GWB does not pave the way for HRC.

GWB will not. . .but his Party may. . .

19 posted on 05/10/2006 1:54:59 PM PDT by cricket (Live Liberal-free. . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
Thats true, but I was talking about discretionary spending. That figure takes into account all spending.

Non Defense and Entitlement Spending fell under Reagan.

Also Reagan had a hostile congress and eventually senate something bush dose not have to deal with.
20 posted on 05/10/2006 2:07:27 PM PDT by spikeytx86 (Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson