Posted on 05/09/2006 11:17:30 PM PDT by MadIvan
The killer who cooked his dinner guests flashes his teeth at the judge as eight-year jail term is increased to life
THE longest-running horror show in modern German legal history, the stomach-churning trial of Armin Meiwes, the Cannibal of Rotenburg, ended yesterday with a clear verdict: a life jail term for murdering a man in order to eat his organs.
As the Frankfurt judges pronounced sentence, Meiwes swayed, nodded, briefly flashed his notorious teeth at the bench and then disappeared through a concealed door to begin a sentence that is expected to last about 15 years.
Behind him he left grisly, graphic images of the perverse nether-world of cannibalism that has been haunting Germany since he was first put in the dock in 2003. Because his victim had expressed a wish to be eaten, an initial trial found Meiwes, 44, guilty of killing on demand equivalent to manslaughter and jailed him for 8½ years. That was too mild, the appeals court ruled, and a retrial was ordered.
Yesterday the judges accepted the prosecution case that there was clear evidence that Meiwess motive was sexual and went beyond his victims wish to die. It was official: cannibalism is murder.
You wanted to record a film in your head, a hit film, Marcus Koehler, the state prosecutor, said, a film that you could play again and again so that you could satisfy yourself sexually.
The judges, who had heard detailed accounts of how Meiwes first severed his victims penis before both men sat down to eat it with a dash of garlic, accepted this argument. They also found Meiwes, who later stabbed his victim in the throat, guilty of desecrating the dead.
But Meiwes, a computer technician and a former army sergeant major, disputed this version in both trials. Eating a man, he said, had been a way of bringing him closer to his brother who had moved out of the family home. Meiwes presented himself as a lonely, confused child under the thumb of a domineering mother.
It was when his brother left home that Meiwes started to grill Barbie dolls and shape marzipan into the form of human limbs.
His cannibal fantasies became reality when he started to surf internet chat rooms and discovered Bernd Juergen Brandes, a computer software specialist from Berlin, who declared himself ready to be eaten. It was not a sex thing, Meiwes said. Every bite I took of him, brought me closer to my brother.
Harald Ermel, the cannibals lawyer, said yesterday that he would be appealing against the sentence. The panel of judges had ignored how the internet had changed the situation of victims and perpetrators, Herr Ermel said. Since Herr Brandes wanted to be eaten, and since his willingness could be proven by e-mail traffic, the cannibal had simply conducted a mercy killing, which carries a maximum sentence of five years.
The Frankfurt judges not only dismissed this idea yesterday but also underlined the possibility that Meiwes could commit the crime again. Soon after killing Herr Brandes in March 2001, Meiwes was on the internet looking for new victims. Bernd told me he did not want to be left alone in the deep freeze, the cannibal said.
His ambition was to feed himself entirely from human flesh and vegetables grown in the garden of his rundown house in the village of Rotenburg.
In his final courtroom speech he declared: I dont need to do it anymore but I do believe everyone should be able to decide what he wants to do with his own body.
Legal experts said yesterday that his appeal was unlikely to succeed. The chances are strong that the life sentence will be interpreted as 15 years and that the past 3½ years of detention will be deducted from the jail term. Meiwes should then be free at the age of 55.
How he is treated by prisoners in the meantime remains to be seen. It may be that he is regarded as the lowest of the low in the prison hierarchy, along with the child molesters, Professor Lorenz Boellinger, a leading criminal psychologist, said. It is not likely that he will receive therapy in jail, though he is obviously in need of it.
So far fellow prisoners have left him alone, especially at meal times. He will be given a job in the prison library, rather than the kitchens.
A TASTE FOR HUMAN FLESH
# The word cannibal is thought to derive from the name of the West Indian Carib tribe documented by Christopher Columbus
# During colonial times, cannibalistic behaviour was often attributed to tribes in the New World and Africa. However, since such reports of savagery were used to justify colonialism, there was motive for exaggeration
# One of the earliest documented accounts of cannibalism is in the writings of Roman historian Flavius Josephus who claims that a Jewish mother ate her own child out of hunger during the Roman destruction of Jerusalem in AD70
# The best known modern example of cannibalism, depicted in the 1993 film Alive, was when an aircraft flying across the Andes crash-landed on a high snowfield, forcing survivors to eat the dead to survive
# The Broadcasting Standards Commission upheld viewers complaints about a 1998 cookery show in which celebrity chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall served a woman her own afterbirth. The meal, shared with friends, included placenta pâté on focaccia bread
Regards, Ivan
Ping!
This concept is so reasonable and straight forward that a few Democrats might even agree with that statement.
It must be lonely in there.
"a sentence that is expected to last about 15 years. "
===
Only 15 years for murder?!
Killing is justified when the end purpose is nourishment. Look around you.
Why no Hanibal Lecter jokes?
I can only hope it's because the shock "value" of that idiotic movie has worn off. :-)
Hmmm..Soylent Green, anyone?
Can we safely draw the multicultural line at cannabilism? After all it is just another of the diverse ways in which humans express themselves. :^)
It's a cookbook!
Well he does appear to be drinking a fine red.
Perhaps I should have put the sarcasm tags on it? I was (perhaps ineptly) trying to point out that since Liberals live by the rule of "the point of life is to do what you want" that calling this murder is indefensible.
I agree with the sentence and I agree with you too. The guy is repugnant, but given the liberal reasoning, this guy shouls have been set free.
First they came for the Cannibals, and I did nothing...
The worst part is that things like the "Living Constitution" are exactly the same thing. The abandonment of objective standards, replaced by liberal whim.
"Only 15 years for murder?!"
No. There are actually 3 degrees of murder sentences in Germany.
1.) "Mord" is the equivalent of second degree murder and carries a mandatory life sentence. However in this case "life" means 30 years with the possibility of parole after 15 years. And that is actually not much shorter than the average sentence served for second degree murder in the US.
2.) "Mord mit besonderer Schwere der Schuld" is more or less the equivalent of first degree murder and excludes the possibility of parole after 15 years, so the sentence has to be served in full. "Besondere Schwere der Schuld" (literal translation: exceptional gravity of the guilt) for example applies to slowly poising someone, torturing someone to death and other kinds of extremely cruel murder as well as e.g. murder to cover up a rape.
3.) "Lebenslang mit anschließender Sicherheitsverwahrung" (literal translation: life sentence with following security lock-up) means that the criminal will have to stay in prison until his natural death. It is the standard sentence if the type of crimes commited make a rehabilitation unlikely (e.g. in the case of a serial killer) or the prisoner's release after X years would still pose a grave threat to society (e.g. in the case of a terrorist). Also, a life sentence can always be extended to "lebenslang mit anschließender Sicherheitsverwahrung" if the criminal's behavior in prison (attempting to kill other inmates, no efforts at rehabilitation etc.) warrants it.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.