There are links to further information at the source document.
If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
To: 351 Cleveland; AFPhys; agenda_express; almcbean; ambrose; Amos the Prophet; AnalogReigns; ...
BreakPoint/Chuck Colson Ping!
If anyone wants on or off my Chuck Colson/BreakPoint Ping List, please notify me here or by freepmail.
2 posted on
05/01/2006 3:09:09 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(TRY JESUS. If you don't like Him, the devil will always take you back.)
To: Mr. Silverback
Society used to be the safety net. No more.
3 posted on
05/01/2006 3:21:09 PM PDT by
Hildy
(Producing a penny now costs the government more than 1.4 cents)
To: Mr. Silverback
There are many tools parents have at their disposal to protect their kiddies from the evils on TV.
4 posted on
05/01/2006 3:22:49 PM PDT by
mnehring
(http://abaraxas.blogspot.com)
To: Mr. Silverback
What the "if-you-don't-like-it-just-change-the-channel" brigade doesn't understand is that we have to raise our children in this coarsened, hyper-sexed society.
Yes, we can change the channel ... or get rid of the TV. But that doesn't make it safe for our little girls to walk around the block.
There are consequences to a cultural indulgence in sexual libertinism ... and every day on the news we see the chickens coming home to roost.
To: Mr. Silverback
The program was not a cable or satellite offering. This is an E! program, which is cable.
7 posted on
05/01/2006 3:36:22 PM PDT by
Lunatic Fringe
(http://ntxsolutions.com)
To: Mr. Silverback
I don't think I've ever heard the F word on broadcast network tv, at least not since Guns N Roses won a grammy. But of course, I have this awesome device called a remote, and it turns off the television.
25 posted on
05/01/2006 5:30:06 PM PDT by
mysterio
To: Mr. Silverback; Just another Joe; CSM; lockjaw02; Publius6961; elkfersupper; nopardons; metesky; ...
This in-your-face attitude is indicative of how far our society has traveled along the path of radical individualismespecially when it comes to anything related to sex. Anything else can be restrainedsmoking in public, driving without a seatbeltall on the grounds that its good for society. But restrain sexual expression? No wayespecially if it makes money. Not exactly a Nanny State Ping -------- thought you would all be interesested in this.
43 posted on
05/02/2006 4:39:47 PM PDT by
Gabz
(Smokers are the beta version)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson