To: spikeytx86
I have to agree here, this is a state issue and should not be molested by the federal government like abortion was. Hello...rouge judges have legislated from the bench and miraculously discovered a clause that gays and lesbians can be married. That is why a constitutional amendment banning gay marriages is being discussed in the first place.
Danforth doesn't know what he's talking about. Anyone who gives a speech to the LCR is not a conservative.
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
That is why a constitutional amendment banning gay marriages is being discussed in the first place.
Is that really the reason or is it that some feel threatened by something they don't understand. No gay couple has ever been, isn't now and will never be a threat to my marriage. Those who feel threatened need to get a life.
28 posted on
04/30/2006 4:58:54 PM PDT by
Joan Kerrey
(what support is Sinclair giving to a candidate)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
The only way I would support a constitutional ban would be if and only if the supreme court magical finds another right in the constitution like they did with roe. Other then that it should be left to the states.
29 posted on
04/30/2006 5:00:02 PM PDT by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
Also if we were to go the route of a ban to stop legislation from the bench, could we not word the amendment to state that all matters regarding marriage and the rights there of are to be left to the states?
35 posted on
04/30/2006 5:04:32 PM PDT by
spikeytx86
(Pray for Democrats for they have been brainwashed by there fruity little club.)
To: Extremely Extreme Extremist
...rouge judges have legislated from the bench and miraculously discovered a clause that gays and lesbians can be married. Great typo:)
59 posted on
04/30/2006 5:31:18 PM PDT by
Ken H
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson