Replies

Any thoughts on post #8? You've got the most factual and minute details of all of this, along with MiaT (I can't read her stuff most of the time, I'm dial-up challenged).

I would value your opinion on whether or not she who will not be named will be seriously challenged with facts by whoever might run against her.

FMCDH(BITS)

Any thoughts on post #8? You've got the most factual and minute details of all of this, along with MiaT (I can't read her stuff most of the time, I'm dial-up challenged). I would value your opinion on whether or not she who will not be named will be seriously challenged with facts by whoever might run against her.

My first, off the top of my head response is "Won't matter- the Drive-By Media either won't even talk about it to begin with, or will spin it in her favor-- just like they did for Bill in 1992 and 1996."

My second response? "But wait a minute- this 'New Media' thing seemed to impact the Jan. 23 election in Canada to an extent nobody forsaw-- so stay tuned."
Might be surprising.

On a "just my 2 cents" note, that woman I lovingly refer to as Hillarrhea!® has the worst negatives of anybody I've ever seen polled... she faces an uphill ( pun ) battle, but given that her darling Hubby, the man I dubbed 'Little Big Fraud™,' fooled America twice, you can't rule her out.