Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Prince Harry Would Be Deployed in Iraq
AP via Yahoo! News ^ | Mon Apr 24, 2006

Posted on 04/24/2006 11:42:24 AM PDT by lizol

Prince Harry Would Be Deployed in Iraq

LONDON - Prince Harry would be involved in "the fullest range of deployments" if his unit is sent to Iraq, but he might be kept out of situations where his presence would jeopardize his comrades, the Ministry of Defense said Monday.

Harry, the 21-year-old second son of Prince Charles and the late Princess Diana, recently completed his training at Sandhurst military academy and is a second lieutenant in the Household Cavalry.

The Mail on Sunday newspaper, quoting unidentified sources, reported that Harry had threatened to resign from the army if he is held out of combat roles.

It's unclear, however, when the question might arise.

The prince will soon start a five-month training course leading to becoming a platoon commander in an armored reconnaissance role. The Ministry of Defense said Harry's unit, the Blues and Royals regiment of the Household Cavalry, will not go to Iraq in the rotation next month, and no date has been set for a possible deployment.

"The intention is for him to undertake the fullest range of deployments" with his unit, said a spokeswoman at the Ministry of Defense, speaking on condition of anonymity in line with government policy.

However, she added, there might be occasions when the presence of a member of the royal family would increase the risk of attack against Harry's comrades, and he could be withheld from those situations.

In an interview last year, the prince insisted that he wanted to be like any other soldier.


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: deployed; greatbritain; gwot; harry; iraq; oif; princeharry; royalfamily; royals; uk; uktroops
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last


1 posted on 04/24/2006 11:42:30 AM PDT by lizol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: lizol

Seems to have the right spirit. They should jump him past his goofy dad in the line of succession.


2 posted on 04/24/2006 11:46:54 AM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus

William is in line before Harry and is MUCH preferable to the father.


3 posted on 04/24/2006 11:48:21 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: twigs

Elizabeth II really appears to be waiting him out. Give the grandkids a chance.


4 posted on 04/24/2006 11:59:01 AM PDT by Argus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: lizol
Good thing he doesn't have his father's ears. They'd have to design special head gear for him.
5 posted on 04/24/2006 12:04:17 PM PDT by ElkGroveDan (California bashers will be called out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

Yeah, and can you imagine him jumping out of a plane with a parachute with such big ears?

Would be like a helicopter :-)))


6 posted on 04/24/2006 12:07:37 PM PDT by lizol (Liberal - a man with his mind open ... at both ends)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

It's what's between the ears that worries me about the father.


7 posted on 04/24/2006 12:12:16 PM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lizol

The royals send a far better example to the citizenry than do the elites here..


8 posted on 04/24/2006 12:12:29 PM PDT by ziggygrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ElkGroveDan

There is hope for the monarchy, yet.


9 posted on 04/24/2006 12:13:00 PM PDT by dfwgator (Florida Gators - 2006 NCAA Men's Basketball Champions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: lizol

If only our elected representatives exhibited the same moxie.


10 posted on 04/24/2006 12:14:36 PM PDT by Ruth A. (we might as well fight in the first ditch as the last)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Applause for Harry.


11 posted on 04/24/2006 12:17:01 PM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Argus

"Elizabeth II really appears to be waiting him out. Give the grandkids a chance."

Just like Queen Victoria! When she finally died, her son, Edward VII didn't last 10 years. His son, George V then reigned for almost 25 years.


12 posted on 04/24/2006 12:18:18 PM PDT by Polyxene (For where God built a church, there the Devil would also build a chapel - Martin Luther)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: KC Burke
I guess it would be proper to add that this confirms the existance and utility of natural aristocracy, and category much maligned and confused with herititary aristocracy.
13 posted on 04/24/2006 12:18:27 PM PDT by KC Burke (Men of intemperate minds can never be free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ziggygrey

"The royals send a far better example . . "

From the photos it appears Harry's ditched his Nazi regalia . . .


14 posted on 04/24/2006 12:32:51 PM PDT by tumblindice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

15 posted on 04/24/2006 12:39:37 PM PDT by PBRSTREETGANG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: lizol

Good for him....he has the blood of a warrior....


16 posted on 04/24/2006 1:03:26 PM PDT by Kimmers (If you want peace you must be prepared for war......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tumblindice

Give me a break. If he wore a UBL costume to a Holloween party would you blast him as being pro-terrorist?


17 posted on 04/24/2006 1:38:40 PM PDT by jmc1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Argus

I applaud his patriotism. But I hope nothing happens to him. If Elizabeth can outlast Charles and Andrew and Harry dies in Iraq and William meets some tragic end...

Say hello to Fergie, Queen Mother.

(Man, I'm embarrassed I know that.)


18 posted on 04/24/2006 1:50:05 PM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Our man in washington

Fergie is no where in the line of succession. You forgot, Princess Ann, Prince Edward, then Andrews daughters, and then Edwards kid.


19 posted on 04/24/2006 1:57:34 PM PDT by SAMS (Nobody loves a soldier until the enemy is at the gate; Army Wife & Marine Mom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SAMS

I know Fergie would never be queen. But she could be queen mother. Or at least, the mother of the queen. Who knows what title they would give her?

Anyway, the rule is that it goes to the kids before it goes to the siblings. If it comes down to #5 in succession, Fergie is the queen mum. See here:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Line_of_succession_to_the_British_throne



20 posted on 04/24/2006 5:17:53 PM PDT by Our man in washington
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson