Posted on 04/21/2006 2:11:41 PM PDT by Unam Sanctam
...
Although he is known for his tolerant, humane views, he is a surprisingly harsh critic of homosexuality. If you are a Buddhist, he says, it is wrong. "Full stop.
No way round it.
"A gay couple came to see me, seeking my support and blessing. I had to explain our teachings. Another lady introduced another woman as her wife - astonishing. It is the same with a husband and wife using certain sexual practices. Using the other two holes is wrong."
At this point, he looks across at his interpreter - who seems mainly redundant - to check that he has been using the right English words to discuss this delicate matter. The interpreter gives a barely perceptible nod.
"A Western friend asked me what harm could there be between consenting adults having oral sex, if they enjoyed it," the Dalai Lama continues, warming to his theme. "But the purpose of sex is reproduction, according to Buddhism. The other holes don't create life. I don't mind - but I can't condone this way of life."
...
(Excerpt) Read more at telegraph.co.uk ...
His pal Richard Gere isn't going to be very happy to hear this.
But the gerbil will be relieved...
I, um, oh, nevermind....
I used to have a lot of respect for this guy, but, after seeing him on stage with Dennis Kucinich(spit, hack!), I'm starting to have some doubts. And:" Using the other two holes is wrong."?? That's none of his business. Dalai Lama Lama Ding Dong
Turns out, the answer is THREE!
Well met, Hoosier-Daddy, well met, indeed.
These are men of great spiritual learning and commitment, they are trying to attain a higher level for humanity than living like animals or worse. Let's face it, that higher standard isn't always convenient for most of us. But it ought to be obvious that acting out our basest fantasies is not a road to enlightenment.
I don't expect to find the Dalai Lhama at a go go bar, and I don't expect him to tell me it would be just peachy if I go there, either.
I put credence in the theory that if you can preoccupy a civilization in sexual pursuits (beyond the norm, especially), it will be much easier to destroy.
You know, perhaps it's not his business if I want to screw a goat. And maybe I like goats. But when he tells me its not the best thing, am I really going to argue with him? There was a time when people respected the views of religious leaders, even if we can't all live up to them.
The Dalai Lama has every right to express his religious and moral beliefs on homosexual activity, as does any traditional Christian believer.
"Gay couple" Now that's a propaganda meme if I ever saw one.
Just call them two homosexuals.
True, I also object to the use of the political term "gay" and prefer instead the more clinical and neutral term "homosexual". However, the thrust of the Dalai Lama's teaching about the reproductive purpose of sex and the wrongfulness of homosexual activity is not inconsistent with Catholic teaching.
That picture is pretty vile...
That is why all the tree hugger freaks want to re wild the world. Animals don't judge (morally).
And they exist at id level.
Relgions create a super ego.
Thank you for that.
It's good to know that I wasn't the only person that was going to post it. LMAO!
The Dalai Lama gets it. Great. Now if only all the westernized faux Buddhists will listen.
So, in the golden time before anyone dreamed up a religion, the super-ego did not exist?
That religion must be pretty persuasive stuff. Is the super-ego inherently alien to human nature?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.