Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Banking on science for future fertility
Contra Costa Times ^ | 4/18/06 | Joan Morris

Posted on 04/18/2006 7:24:22 AM PDT by qam1

From the moment a baby girl is born, her fertility clock begins the countdown. Though she has millions of eggs in her immature ovaries, by the time she's a woman, the viability of those eggs has already started to diminish.

By age 40, her chances of conceiving have declined, while her chances of having a child with chromosomal abnormalities have increased. And if she's like thousands of women in their 30s who have yet to meet Mr. Right and whose careers and personal choices don't include, for now, child rearing, she may find herself wishing that should could freeze time.

Actually, she may be able to. Although the procedure is still considered by many to be experimental, about 200 fertility centers around the country are using new technology to collect and freeze unfertilized eggs of women in their 30s for use in their 40s.

Until now, egg banking has been employed mostly by women about to undergo chemotherapy for cancer. What is new is who it is being marketed to: thirtysomethings who are postponing having families. They see it as a way to improve their odds of having healthy children.

For older women, fertility issues generally lie not with the uterus, but with the eggs.

"We can make the uterus do what we want it to do," said Dr. Mary Ramie Hinckley, a reproductive endocrinologist at Reproductive Science Center of the San Francisco Bay Area. "Egg quality is the problem."

Even though a woman in her 40s is capable of conceiving, she stands a greater chance of complications and of having a child with health issues. As she ages, the risk of bearing a child with certain chromosomal disorders increases. A 25-year-old woman has a 1 in 1,250 chance of having a baby with Down syndrome; at age 45, the risk is 1 in 30.

But if a woman preserves and banks her eggs when she is 35, then those are available to her if she decides to have a child at 45.

Hinckley said her group has recently begun offering the procedure to women who want to safeguard their fertility.

"Sperm freezing has been around for decades," Hinckley said, "followed by high success rates with embryo preservation. Now we're having a much better success rate for freezing and thawing unfertilized eggs."

While egg banking has so far drawn none of the controversy and ethical dilemmas that preserving embryos has, the success rate with the eggs has been low, Hinckley said. Eggs, she said, can be fragile, and when frozen, they can shatter like a glass bottle left too long in the freezer.

The chance of taking a frozen egg, thawing it, fertilizing it and having a successful implantation has been only about 5 percent. But new techniques have improved that numbers, increasing the probability of conception to 20 percent.

The odds are still low, Hinckley said, but improving.

The numbers are too low for some. The official position of the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology is that the procedure should be limited to women whose fertility is threatened by illness and disease.

"It's something that isn't really ready to be offered commercially," said society spokeswoman Eleanor Nicoll, "because the success rates for it still aren't very good. It's still under development, and a lot of work is still needed."

She said the society is concerned that women might place the future of their fertility on a procedure that may not work for them. They could be banking on a pregnancy that will never happen while overlooking the obvious: getting pregnant in the traditional way.

While Hinckley and others readily acknowledge that egg banking is not for everyone and that it still has relatively low rates of success, it can offer a measure of security and insurance for some.

Reproductive Science Center, which has offices in San Ramon, Orinda, Fremont and San Jose, sets an age limit on using banked eggs. Women must undergo the implantation procedure before their 51st birthday.

The cost of collecting eggs is an expensive one, Hinckley said. Women undergoing the procedure receive a daily injection for eight to 10 days to stimulate egg production. Then 10 to 15 eggs are extracted in an outpatient process. The price is $6,000.

The eggs are then frozen and shipped to a storage facility in Minnesota, said Kristin Ivani, a reproductive biologist who oversees the lab for the Reproductive Science Center. Cost of long-term storage is about $1 a day.

Should a woman later decide to use the eggs, there is another fee for thawing, fertilizing and implanting.

Egg banking is a natural progression of reproductive science, Hinckley and Ivani said.

"It's next new thing," Ivani said.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: assistedpregnancy; female; fertility; genx; havemorebabies; infertility; ivf; midlife; motherhood; oldermoms; petridish; pregnancy; testtubebaby; woman; women

1 posted on 04/18/2006 7:24:23 AM PDT by qam1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: qam1; ItsOurTimeNow; PresbyRev; tortoise; Fraulein; StoneColdGOP; Clemenza; m18436572; ...
Xer Ping

Ping list for the discussion of the politics and social (and sometimes nostalgic) aspects that directly effects Generation Reagan / Generation-X (Those born from 1965-1981) including all the spending previous generations (i.e. The Baby Boomers) are doing that Gen-X and Y will end up paying for.

Freep mail me to be added or dropped. See my home page for details and previous articles.

2 posted on 04/18/2006 7:27:57 AM PDT by qam1 (There's been a huge party. All plates and the bottles are empty, all that's left is the bill to pay)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: qam1

This thread has potential to be interesting.....

Back to fully read the article.


3 posted on 04/18/2006 7:30:31 AM PDT by Hoodlum91 (Tour guide goddess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hoodlum91

A friend of my cousins used fertility injectibles, they wanted just one more child. They are inducing her for her triplets this week. 5 kids total.

In a related note my wife and I used repronex and had twins.


4 posted on 04/18/2006 7:36:24 AM PDT by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hoodlum91
This thread has potential to be interesting.....

This thread has the potential to reach a thousand posts. Here's the breakdown: 166 will be hilarious, 167 will be thoughtful and valid, 333 will be bitterly critical of American women, and 333 will be furiously critical of the men who criticize American women.

5 posted on 04/18/2006 7:40:51 AM PDT by Fairview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Fairview
This thread has the potential to reach a thousand posts. Here's the breakdown: 166 will be hilarious, 167 will be thoughtful and valid, 333 will be bitterly critical of American women, and 333 will be furiously critical of the men who criticize American women.

ROFL

6 posted on 04/18/2006 7:45:34 AM PDT by Chiapet (I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fairview

LOL!!!

All true, sadly. Have we really gotten that predictable?


7 posted on 04/18/2006 7:49:52 AM PDT by Hoodlum91 (Tour guide goddess)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Fairview

I would say that's about accurate!


8 posted on 04/18/2006 7:57:39 AM PDT by RockinRight (Yes...she's an excellent tour guide!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chiapet

How incredibly accurate! Check out
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1595876/posts
Proves your point right on the money!


9 posted on 04/18/2006 8:50:57 AM PDT by LibertyGrrrl (http://www.conservativepunk.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LibertyGrrrl

Hey, I checked out that thread. Just wanted to say congratulations to you on your twins :)


10 posted on 04/18/2006 12:30:26 PM PDT by Chiapet (I hate to advocate drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they've always worked for me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Fairview

So far, you're wrong on all counts.


11 posted on 04/19/2006 4:25:56 PM PDT by grellis (can't sleep clown will eat me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Chiapet

Thanx! They just turned 2 a couple of weeks ago. My husband and I feel totally blessed! They're sooooo incredible....


12 posted on 04/19/2006 11:02:51 PM PDT by LibertyGrrrl (http://www.conservativepunk.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson