To: robowombat
In this situation there is nothing that DNA can do for you; you have no reliable evidence for comparison.
3 posted on
04/18/2006 6:19:40 AM PDT by
ARCADIA
(Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
To: ARCADIA
"In this situation there is nothing that DNA can do for you; you have no reliable evidence for comparison." Other than his brother and sister's remains.
4 posted on
04/18/2006 6:24:11 AM PDT by
JustRight
To: ARCADIA
In this situation there is nothing that DNA can do for you; you have no reliable evidence for comparison. You mean that the known remains of a brother and sister are not reliable?
21 posted on
04/18/2006 7:09:12 AM PDT by
AFreeBird
(your mileage may vary)
To: ARCADIA
There was an article about this JPJ mystery in the National Geographic magazine recently and they said that there's a lock of his hair at the academy, with a letter from some woman. So they might be able to compare it with that.
To: ARCADIA
It could. Jones' DNA would have specific markers unique to Scotsmen. If the body has those markers, it could be him and not some frog. If it doesn't have those markers, odds are it ain't him.
46 posted on
04/18/2006 12:16:35 PM PDT by
Junior
(Identical fecal matter, alternate diurnal period)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson