To: davesdude; Wolfie
I don't recall which poster was against legalization on a thread a couple of weeks ago because there was no field test for marijuana impairment. Sounds like that's not the stumbling block some might make it out to be.
8 posted on
04/11/2006 9:33:46 AM PDT by
cryptical
(Wretched excess is just barely enough.)
To: cryptical
"I don't recall which poster was against legalization on a thread a couple of weeks ago because there was no field test for marijuana impairment."
You mean bloodshot eyes and a bag of Cheetos wouldn't be evidence? :)
10 posted on
04/11/2006 9:34:53 AM PDT by
mlc9852
To: cryptical
There is a test, involves involuntary eye movement, plus many Highway (no pun intended) patrol officers are DRO certified, Drug Recognition Officers. bottom line if you are stoned, beyond maybe a little high it is detectable by someone trained to look for it.
129 posted on
04/11/2006 11:47:30 AM PDT by
enraged
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson