John Kerry Opposes Iran Nuke Strike, Backs Censure

newsmax ^ | 4/9/06 | Carl Limbacher

[dirtbiker]

The dems are pantie-waist douche bags.

That, sir, is an INSULT to douche bags everywhere.....

The dems (and liberals) problem is that the whole lot suffers from cranial rectosis, which occurs when one has their head up their rectum for excessive periods of time....(hence, my tagline...)

[DoughtyOne]

I've got less paint on my new car.

Thanks for the link. Kerry has gone mental, yes even more so...

[Nik Naym]

Note to Mr. Kerry:

You are irrelevant. Please sit down and Sierra Tango Foxtrot Uniform.

Thank you.

[kabar]

Kerry was willing to accept these unverified reports in the MSM about the US using tactical nuclear weapons against Iran as being true. He called it cowboy diplomacy without even knowing the facts. What a jerk.

[do the dhue]

You said:
"I think one of the reasons is that they have nameless and faceless people behind them that supply them with the money and the structure they need to get elected. "

Yes, and I say the nameless and faceless people are Commies.

http://communistsforkerry.com/

[F.J. Mitchell]

John Kerry opposes any response other than kissing butt. That could explain Theresa's reaction in that now infamous photo, as John attempted to press his but kissing lips to hers.

[Red6]

The best bunker busters we have can punch about 130 feet into the earth (GBU 28). Insufficient for what we would need to do.

There is a logical progression in ideas here. If you don’t want Iran to have a bomb you will have to inevitably draw the conclusion that we need to attack them. If you want to be effective in this attack you will come to the conclusion that small tactical bunker busting nukes are necessary.

What Kerry is saying in reality is that he does not want to stop Iran’s nuclear ambitions. That he lacks the resolve to take adequate measures to ensure they are stopped. Just stating he’s against them developing a nuke but then stopping far shy of any action to support his words is De facto allowing them to do what they want. He should move to Europe, they think the same way in many parts there as well. He would fit in well there.

Just like nuclear power which had this evil stigma associated with it and Chernobyl only added ammunition for the green envoro hippy idiot; Hiroshima and Nagasaki are used as examples of the horrors of nuclear weapons. A near miniature nuke where the effect of the detonation is even tailored like in a bunker buster detonating 130-140 feet bellow the surface, as would be the case will not develop a blast, massive over pressure above land crushing houses, blowing cars away, igniting buildings and all the other bad things which we are repeatedly force fed in short video segments that tell us nuclear weapons are all bad.

Personally I think this is an issue where ignorance combined with ideology is over riding the truth and what is necessitated by the situation. 20 years ago it was necessary to build more nuclear power plants. Today we are paying for our ignorance based on misconceptions and over inflated risks. A mini nuke with a tailored blast going off 130 feet under the ground might not be such a horrible thing. But sell that one in today’s public perception! I hope that in 10 years we don’t pay the price for today’s ignorance.

[John Valentine]

I call him an asshat.

[mass55th]

Isn't that just like Kerry. Willing to give the terrorists a pass, but wants to burn the President for doing his job.

[Txsleuth]

Remember, when the John-Johns...Kerry and Edwards, were running for POTUS/VP, ...

they campaigned on the "plan" that they would GIVE the Iranians the uranium to "test" them, and see if they could "trust" them....

LOL....idiots!

[do the dhue]

I think you could sell it to middle America no problem. It's the brain dead liberals on the coasts who would never buy it. And the liberal response would send a message to me that it would be a damn good idea to address Iranian threat with any means in our inventory.

[Westlander]

That's decorated 'war hero' to you.

[HarmlessLovableFuzzball]

You realize of course how a tactical nuclear device , bearing no resemblence in power to an actual nuclear bomb, is going to be played by the MSM.

"The very word 'nuclear' will be enough for them to scream 'America repeats Hiroshima after 60 years".
"George Bush unleashes nuclear terror."
Any number of ways. MSM be damned, I hope Bush 'settles' the Iran issue before he leaves office. That will be his third great achievement in foreign policy. His legacy would for ever be secured.

[greasepaint]

Kerry should be put in charge
of negotiating with Tehran.

I'd like to know how far he gets.

[Enchante]

Headline should read:

"John Kerry Declares He is Still As Big a Whining Wanker As Ever.....And Wonders If There's Another Mega-Million Dollar Heiress Around for Him to Marry, Since He's Grown Tired of the One He Has...."

[JasonC]

Oh, persuade them. That's obvious then. They make super belligerent noise and get a $65 price for their oil and the world beating a path to their door to kiss their backsides. What are you going to negotiate? What pose you strike as they ream you?

[do the dhue]

You are correct Fuzzball.

But when it comes to our security, should we worry about MSN or France? I don't care how Mikhail Moore, Dan Rather, the UN or John Kerry thinks we should handle this problem. I voted for the person who I felt would do what is necessary to protect us from an outside threat. In other words, I voted for the person who I thought would do their job.

I think considering all options is wise.

[do the dhue]

How do you post pictures?

[DoughtyOne]

I didn't read the whole trancript, did he remind us of that again, or was it required in his intro?

I consider the average grunt in Vietnam to be a very big hero. John just doesn't measure up IMO.

[do the dhue]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1612200/posts

Verry
Leftwards 2004