officer bar brady "nothing to see here..."
Didn't al-Qaeda take credit for this?
Didn't al-Qaeda take credit for this?
Didn't al-Qaeda take credit for this?
I would bet what the report will say is that the investigation didn't manage to uncover evidence of al-qaeda direction.
This then gets spun in the anti-Bush/Blair MSM as a positive assertion that in fact al-qaeda had no role in the attack.
Kind of like the weapons of mass destruction issue. The Duelfer team indicates that the investigation does not uncover evidence of stockpiles, and then the MSM reports this as a positive assertion that Saddam did not in fact have them.
Memo to Bin Ladin:
Sorry.
You can come out of hiding now.
Are they still trying to figure out if there was a Muslim link?
Well then, these terrorists must have been just your average members of the 'Religion of Peace'...
But then who doesn't know that except George Bush...
There's no way the London or Madrid or NYC bombers ever even read, or followed, the same instruction manual, aka---
Sura 9:5 of the Koranus, Slay the idolaters wherever you find them, and take them captives and besiege them and lie in wait for them in every ambush.
I knew it! First there were no WMDs and now it wasn't al-Qaeda! HAD TO BE BUSH! By the way, Holocaust wasn't real...Global Warming is going to destroy the world...abortion is a civil-right...our borders don't need ot be protected you bunch racists...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...yada...
Here is a link to the source Observer story for anyone who is interested:
http://observer.guardian.co.uk/uk_news/story/0,,1750139,00.html
I'm not sure that the headline that the Sydney Morning Herald has chosen to lead with is an accurate reflection of the contents of the actual story.