Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: LS
there have been two grand juries and two petite juries and in all four of these cases, there has been no evidence that anyone but McVeigh and Nichols were the culprits.

~~~~~~~~

Juries can only consider evidence prsented to them in court. In all these instances, the prosecutors filtered the evidence very heavily to obtain the (predetermined, IMO) results they and their masters wanted.

Read the transcripts of the McVeigh trial, for instance. Of the nearly two dozen eyewitnesses who saw McVeigh in OKC, none (zero, zip, nada) of them were allowed to testify.

Why? Because all of those witnesses had testified (deposed) that McVeigh had someone else with him!

88 posted on 04/03/2006 10:06:07 AM PDT by TXnMA (Allah is not the Creator. Allah is Shaitan in disguise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies ]


To: TXnMA

Um, McVeigh had a defense attorney, right? Isn't it his job to call those people? Did he not know about them? If not, was he that stupid?


96 posted on 04/03/2006 10:16:32 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of news)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson