Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Task Force Urges Measures to Strengthen North American Competitiveness, Expand Trade, Ensure Border
Council on Foreign Relations ^ | May 17, 2005 | Council on Foreign Relations

Posted on 03/30/2006 8:33:34 AM PST by SBD1

Pointing to increased competition from the European Union and rising economic powers such as India and China in the eleven years since NAFTA took effect, co-chair Pedro C. Aspe, former Finance Minister of Mexico, said, "We need a vision for North America to address the new challenges." The Task Force establishes a blueprint for a powerhouse North American trading area that allows for the seamless movement of goods, increased labor mobility, and energy security.

Task Force Urges Measures to Strengthen North American Competitiveness, Expand Trade, Ensure Border Security May 17, 2005 Council on Foreign Relations

May 17, 2005--North America is vulnerable on several fronts: the region faces terrorist and criminal security threats, increased economic competition from abroad, and uneven economic development at home. In response to these challenges, a trinational, Independent Task Force on the Future of North America has developed a roadmap to promote North American security and advance the well-being of citizens of all three countries.

When the leaders of Canada, Mexico, and the United States met in Texas recently they underscored the deep ties and shared principles of the three countries. The Council-sponsored Task Force applauds the announced "Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America," but proposes a more ambitious vision of a new community by 2010 and specific recommendations on how to achieve it.

Pointing to increased competition from the European Union and rising economic powers such as India and China in the eleven years since NAFTA took effect, co-chair Pedro C. Aspe, former Finance Minister of Mexico, said, "We need a vision for North America to address the new challenges." The Task Force establishes a blueprint for a powerhouse North American trading area that allows for the seamless movement of goods, increased labor mobility, and energy security.

"We are asking the leaders of the United States, Mexico, and Canada to be bold and adopt a vision of the future that is bigger than, and beyond, the immediate problems of the present," said co-chair John P. Manley, Former Canadian Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance. "They could be the architects of a new community of North America, not mere custodians of the status quo."

At a time of political transition in Canada and Mexico, the Task Force proposes new ideas to cope with continental challenges that should be the focus of debate in those two countries as well as the United States. To ensure a free, secure, just, and prosperous North America, the Task Force proposes a number of specific measures:

Make North America safer:

Establish a common security perimeter by 2010.

Develop a North American Border Pass with biometric identifiers.

Develop a unified border action plan and expand border customs facilities.

Create a single economic space:

Adopt a common external tariff.

Allow for the seamless movement of goods within North America.

Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the U.S.

Develop a North American energy strategy that gives greater emphasis to reducing emissions of greenhouse gases -- a regional alternative to Kyoto.

Review those sectors of NAFTA that were excluded.

Develop and implement a North American regulatory plan that would include "open skies and open roads" and a unified approach for protecting consumers on food, health, and the environment.

Expand temporary worker programs and create a "North American preference" for immigration for citizens of North America.

Spread benefits more evenly:

Establish a North American Investment Fund to build infrastructure to connect Mexico's poorer regions in the south to the market to the north. Restructure and reform Mexico's public finances. Fully develop Mexican energy resources to make greater use of international technology and capital. Institutionalize the partnership:

Establish a permanent tribunal for trade and investment disputes.

Convene an annual North American summit meeting.

Establish a Tri-national Competition Commission to develop a common approach to trade remedies.

Expand scholarships to study in the three countries and develop a network of Centers for North American Studies.

Co-chair William F. Weld, former Governor of Massachusetts and U.S. Assistant Attorney General, said, "We are three liberal democracies; we are adjacent; we are already intertwined economically; we have a great deal in common historically; culturally, we have a lot to learn from one another."

Organized in association with the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales and the Canadian Council of Chief Executives, the Task Force includes prominent former officials, businessmen, and academic experts from all three countries. A Chairmen's Statement was released in March in advance of the trinational summit; the full report represents the consensus of the entire Task Force membership and leadership.

Chief Executive of the Canadian Council of Chief ExecutivesThomas d'Aquino, President of the Consejo Mexicano de Asuntos Internacionales Andrés Rozental, and Director of the Center for North American Studies at American University Robert A. Pastor serve as vice chairs.Chappell H. Lawson, Associate Professor of political science at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, is director.

Building a North American Community: Report of the Independent Task Force on the Future of North America is available on the Council website.

SBD


TOPICS:
KEYWORDS: border; cfr; immigration; nafta; puppetmasters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last
Upon reading the Task Force report, I am convince that the CFR is the reason our borders are not enforced.

SBD

1 posted on 03/30/2006 8:33:36 AM PST by SBD1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SBD1; GMMAC; Pikamax; Former Proud Canadian; Great Dane; Alberta's Child; headsonpikes; Ryle; ...
Image hosting by Photobucket
2 posted on 03/30/2006 8:34:37 AM PST by fanfan ( We have become the best/biggest news gathering entity in the whole known history of the world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

Everything is included in that list except the new currency that would be for use only in this trading sphere.

No dallah, no peso, no loonie but one regional currency.

Wonder why they left that out?


3 posted on 03/30/2006 8:36:59 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

I think I figured out what happaned to Atlantis - it did not sink under the water or was buried in an earthquake. It simply became part of the greater middle east and since every standard was lowered - it being great - simply ceased to exist.

Cancer kills. The host always, sooner or later dies.


4 posted on 03/30/2006 8:37:24 AM PST by edcoil (Reality doesn't say much - doesn't need too)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1
Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the U.S.

Mexico wasn't included.
5 posted on 03/30/2006 8:37:27 AM PST by loreldan (Lincoln, Reagan, & G. W. Bush - the cure for Democrat lunacy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

Sounds like the European Unionizing of North America. Should the US, Canada, and Mexico adopt a common currency, too?


6 posted on 03/30/2006 8:37:52 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

I'm pretty much convinced of the same thing without their report.


7 posted on 03/30/2006 8:38:58 AM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

Why not start taking over more of northern Mexico? Mexico City can't control it and the people living there seem more interested in getting into the US. Let's bring the United States to them.


8 posted on 03/30/2006 8:39:01 AM PST by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1
Move to full labor mobility between Canada and the U.S.

Hmm, did they leave out somebody in this "economic triad?"

9 posted on 03/30/2006 8:40:33 AM PST by Yo-Yo (USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bobjam

Mexico obviously has no national pride - in their own country. Their national pride seems to be based on grabbing what isn't theirs.


10 posted on 03/30/2006 8:40:47 AM PST by Fitzcarraldo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SBD1
CFR wants to merge USA, Canada and Mexico??

Yanked many chains lately? ;)

11 posted on 03/30/2006 8:41:50 AM PST by Graymatter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yo-Yo
Sounds like the European Unionizing of North America.

That's exactly what it is: the creation of a "Greater North America" to compete with the EU -- using U.S. capital and entrepreneurship, natural resources from Canada, and Mexican labor.

12 posted on 03/30/2006 8:41:56 AM PST by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SBD1

"Spread benefits more evenly:"

Sounds kinda ominous, no?


13 posted on 03/30/2006 8:42:08 AM PST by Pessimist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1
"Establish a North American Investment Fund to build infrastructure to connect Mexico's poorer regions in the south to the market to the north. Restructure and reform Mexico's public finances. Fully develop Mexican energy resources to make greater use of international technology and capital. Institutionalize the partnership:"
__________________________________

IOW, raise Mexico from it's current 2nd rate status.

It makes sense to have good cooperative relationships with our two largest trading partners.
14 posted on 03/30/2006 8:44:03 AM PST by wmfights (Lead, Follow, or Get Out Of The WAY!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pessimist

Yeah, it sounds pretty damn communist to me. What do they want to turn us into? The North American Union as oppose to the European Union?


15 posted on 03/30/2006 8:44:48 AM PST by gun_supporter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SBD1
Upon reading the Task Force report, I am convince that the CFR is the reason our borders are not enforced.

And with hundreds of these Marxist minions in appointed government positions surrounding the president, they will likely have their way for a while longer.

16 posted on 03/30/2006 8:45:29 AM PST by eskimo (Political groupies - rabid defenders of the indefensible.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBD1
Establish a common security perimeter by 2010

Hee hee..... hahahahaha.....chortle chuckle.....wheeze cough.....

17 posted on 03/30/2006 8:45:36 AM PST by Ben Mugged (labor unions are socialism's shock troops)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Fitzcarraldo

Mexico City alone accounts for over a quarter of the nation's population. The rest seem to be in and around tourist cities. Poor people in the north are not a priority for politicians.


18 posted on 03/30/2006 8:47:42 AM PST by bobjam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: wmfights

"IOW, raise Mexico from it's current 2nd rate status.

It makes sense to have good cooperative relationships with our two largest trading partners."

Unless Mexico gets a complete overhaul, the corruption will be ten times worse under this plan. The Mexican way of Government has to be changed.


19 posted on 03/30/2006 8:48:43 AM PST by OpusatFR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SBD1
Going back to the CFR reports from the 30 or more years ago concerning Europe, one will find that they make no bones about the fact that they consider economic union to be a stepping stone to political unification. In other words, proposals like these are a direct threat to the sovereignty of the United States.

I say "No thanks".

20 posted on 03/30/2006 8:49:04 AM PST by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-75 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson