To: Gengis Khan
BUMP!
2 posted on
03/29/2006 7:17:35 AM PST by
BullDog108
("Conservatives believe in God. Liberals think they are God." ---Ann Coulter)
To: Gengis Khan
Whats new, bribery is a sport in Washington.
3 posted on
03/29/2006 7:28:41 AM PST by
jec41
(Screaming Eagle)
To: Gengis Khan
To: Gengis Khan
http://www.outlookindia.com/full.asp?fodname=20060327&fname=raman&sid=1
And what was puled specifically?
The Guilty Generals Of 9/11
The proceedings of the PAC of Pakistan's National Assembly, as reported by the Friday Times, underline once again the need for a detailed enquiry into the possible complicity of senior Pakistani Generals in the terrorist strikes of 9/11.
To: Gengis Khan
Well .. if this is true .. and I don't know that it is .. it would prove to me what I always believed: the commission was a joke.
6 posted on
03/29/2006 7:39:45 AM PST by
CyberAnt
(Democrats/Old Media: "controversy, crap and confusion" -- Amen!)
To: Gengis Khan
Yikes...
On the morning of September 11, Pakistan's Chief Spy General Mahmoud Ahmad, the alleged "money-man" behind the 9-11 hijackers, was at a breakfast meeting on Capitol Hill hosted by Senator Bob Graham and Rep. Porter Goss, the chairmen of the Senate and House Intelligence committees.
Global Research
According to accounts in both The Times of India and India Today, former [Pakistan] ISI chief Lt. Gen. Mahmud Ahmad instructed [Ahmed Omar Sayeed] Sheikh [one of bin Laden's money men and accused in the murder of Daniel Pearl] to send the $100,000 to [Mohammed] Atta.
World Net Daily
Related articles with more info about 9/11 Commission bribe:
Pakistan weekly spills 9/11 beans
Did Pakistan influence the 9/11 Commission Report?
See also:
PAKISTAN & 9/11
To: Gengis Khan
This might solve one of the great mysteries of 9/11, the Pakistani middle-school kid in Brooklyn who stood up in class on 9/4 and pointed at the towers and said "in one week they won't be there anymore."
10 posted on
03/29/2006 8:09:30 AM PST by
denydenydeny
("Osama... made the mistake of confusing media conventional wisdom with reality" (Mark Steyn))
To: Gengis Khan
To: Gengis Khan
Har! The laughingstock '9//11 Commission' was not only incompetent, it was corrupt, too??
Excuse me for not being the slightest bit surprised.
To: texas_mrs
To: Gengis Khan
We should probably treat this with healthy skepticism. If it's really true though and there's genuine evidence that can back it up, then every member of the Commission or their staff who took money should be arrested and put on trial, and I don't care if it's Democrats or Republicans that took money.
20 posted on
03/29/2006 8:51:10 AM PST by
jpl
("We don't negotiate with terrorists, we put them out of business." - Scott McClellan)
To: Gengis Khan
New Delhi, Mar 19: Pakistan is alleged to have spent "tens of thousands of dollars" through its lobbyists in the United States to get some findings against it by the 9/11 inquiry commission dropped from its report, a media report has claimed. This makes me question the veracity of this report. Democrats on the committee are far too greedy to be bought off for a mere "tens of thousands" of dollars. They would have extorted millions if such an opportunity presented itself.
24 posted on
03/29/2006 8:59:49 AM PST by
Auntie Dem
(Hey! Hey! Ho! Ho! Terrorist lovers gotta go!)
To: Gengis Khan
No-one with any integrity sat on that commission.
26 posted on
03/29/2006 9:05:25 AM PST by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: All
44. The omission of the fact that General Mahmoud Ahmad, the head of Pakistan's intelligence agency (the ISI), was in Washington the week prior to 9/11, meeting with CIA chief George Tenet and other US officials (103-04).
45. The omission of evidence that ISI chief Ahmad had ordered $100,000 to be sent to Mohamed Atta prior to 9/11 (104-07).
46. The Commission's claim that it found no evidence that any foreign government, including Pakistan, had provided funding for the al-Qaeda operatives (106).
47. The omission of the report that the Bush administration pressured Pakistan to dismiss Ahmad as ISI chief after the appearance of the story that he had ordered ISI money sent to Atta (107-09).
48. The omission of evidence that the ISI (and not merely al-Qaeda) was behind the assassination of Ahmad Shah Masood (the leader of Afghanistan's Northern Alliance), which occurred just after the week-long meeting between the heads of the CIA and the ISI (110-112).
49. The omission of evidence of ISI involvement in the kidnapping and murder of Wall Street Reporter Daniel Pearl (113).
50. The omission of Gerald Posner's report that Abu Zubaydah claimed that a Pakistani military officer, Mushaf Ali Mir, was closely connected to both the ISI and al-Qaeda and had advance knowledge of the 9/11 attacks (114).
51. The omission of the 1999 prediction by ISI agent Rajaa Gulum Abbas that the Twin Towers would be "coming down" (114).
56. The omission of the fact that Unocal had declared that the Taliban could not provide adequate security for it to go ahead with its oil-and-gas pipeline from the Caspian region through Afghanistan and Pakistan (122-25).
To: sukhoi-30mki; Cronos; CarrotAndStick; razoroccam; Arjun; samsonite; Bombay Bloke; mindfever; ...
To: Dog; Straight Vermonter; Gucho; TexKat; SandRat
31 posted on
03/29/2006 9:37:53 AM PST by
Wiz
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson