Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why has there been no major TV story highlighting Clinton’s refusal to accept Osama from Sudan?

Posted on 03/25/2006 3:42:55 AM PST by stockstrader

As a supporter of the President and his efforts in the WOT, I spend (waste)a fair amount of time debating liberals. Their last gasp is always the standard question, “Well then, why hasn’t Bush caught Osama yet”?

My standard tongue-in-cheek response is, “Why don’t you ask your hero, President Clinton? Sudan offered him Osama three times—only to be turned down by Clinton—who stated that Osama had not committed any crime against the US. Osama was then sent to Afghanistan –where he made the mess that President Bush was left to clean up”! Of course, liberals deny that this really happened.

My question is this. Why has the MSM (or otherwise) NOT done a TV documentary on EXACTLY what happened with this alleged offer?

Why has no one (MSM, FOX, Nightline, 60 Minutes, 20/20, John Stossel. Geraldo, Ollie North, History Channel, A&E,,,WHATEVER) done an hour special on this topic with interviews and statements from all the players to include: President Clinton, VP Gore, Sandy Berger (and others from the NSC), Madeleine Albright (and others from the State Dept), SECDEF, CIA, FBI, and any ambassadors/officials/intermediaries to or from Sudan who may have been involved.

If the offer actually did occur, why has no one done a complete, thorough and exhaustive story on it? A background history (starting with Osama’s involvement in the WTC 1993) with timeline/chronology of events and interviews/statements and opinions from as many players as possible would be a great way to educate (and remind everyone) of what happened. It would remove a lot of disinformation out there, AND, help highlight and remind the American public about the national security situation that was ignored during the Clinton years--and inherited by President Bush.

Why not do a complete story about it now, before Hillary and Bill once again do their particular REWRITING OF HISTORY—which we all know will happen (and has already happened to some extent) before she enters the Presidential race. It would also help remind the American public of the REAL Clinton LEGACY—which President Bush is doing his best to clean up right now.

Again, why has NO ONE in the media done a MAJOR research project/TV story on this topic?


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 03/25/2006 3:43:00 AM PST by stockstrader
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
Media bias manifests itself in several ways.

-what the media reports and how it reports it;
-what the media ignores;
-what the media hypes and then suddenly drops;

The media has a template and is easily confused by stories that don't fit that template. Note the meager and lackluster coverage given to:

-Food for oil scandal
-UN peacekeeper abuse
-French riots
-Cartoon riots

They feel comfortable with stories that fit their template. For instance if there is a terrorist attack in Italy within the next several weeks, they will feel comfortable with that story; if it's in Spain or France, they will be totally confused and struggle with how to fit it into its template.

The media had no interest in exposing Clinton's careless treatment of the terrorists in the 90s. Their goal is to restore a Democratic Congress.
2 posted on 03/25/2006 3:53:22 AM PST by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Cause the m.s.m. wants another clinton presidency. After all unlike President Bush, the clintons think the m.s.m. is relevant.


3 posted on 03/25/2006 3:53:50 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Do you really have to ask?


4 posted on 03/25/2006 3:55:35 AM PST by Recovering_Democrat ((I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of Dependence on Government!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot from Philly

For the reasons you outline, it seems to me that our country becomes more Orwellian with each passing day. The old media is little more than the Democrat's Ministry of Truth, where lies become truth, and truth becomes a lie.


5 posted on 03/25/2006 4:22:47 AM PST by Jacquerie (Democrats soil institutions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie
We need to counter that, though. I wish Bush/Cheney and company had done their push back earlier.

Asking Helen Thomas a question was brilliant. The media is now aware that many are watching their coverage.

Interestingly, the fools don't seem aware of how much they are despised by many people in America.
6 posted on 03/25/2006 4:27:42 AM PST by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Since the Clintons are LIEberal media stars lets not push to give them publicity.

Cause ya know in Hollywoody, good news/bad news, for Dem, it;s all good.


7 posted on 03/25/2006 4:35:25 AM PST by funkywbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe Boucher
The MSM is relevant... very relevant... as a 24/7 propaganda service for the DNC. It's power over the masses is fully acknowledged by many Republicans, who will attempt to curry it's favor by bucking the president or their party.

While FOXNews beats all the news networks in individual ratings... it loses out when the ALL the opposition numbers are totaled. Combine that with an overwhelmingly, 'progressive' press and you see just how 'relevant' they are.

8 posted on 03/25/2006 4:43:21 AM PST by johnny7 (“Nah, I ain’t Jewish, I just don’t dig on swine, that’s all.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader
Why has there been no major TV story highlighting Clinton’s refusal to accept Osama from Sudan?

A question that is very easy to answer.

He is a Liberal/Socialist/Progressive/Marxist and so are 98% of the MSM.

The MSM and most of Hollywood idolize him because he is such an excellent liar.

The MSM hate Conservatives so they go overboard protecting the lying, perverted scum that is now the DeMARXocrat party.

9 posted on 03/25/2006 4:44:16 AM PST by Dustbunny (The only good terrorist is a dead terrorist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

"It does not advance the MSM's Action Line"!
Rush Limbaugh

LLS


10 posted on 03/25/2006 4:45:46 AM PST by LibLieSlayer (Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Patriot from Philly
Yes, Helen Thomas came across as a drooling, rabid moonbat. She didn't ask questions as much as she made accusations. I about came out of my chair when she wagged her finger at the President.

I also hope the spectacle of self important stinkin' journalists publicly dressing down the President struck others the way it struck me.

11 posted on 03/25/2006 4:47:38 AM PST by Jacquerie (Democrats soil institutions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Why is there air?


12 posted on 03/25/2006 4:49:45 AM PST by gotribe (Just tired of going easy on islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Bill Clinton is almighty! Glory to his name. Thou shalt bow bown before him thrice a day. Thou shalt not sully his name. Thou shalt not comingle fact with his history. Thou shalt applaud his every step.


13 posted on 03/25/2006 4:57:23 AM PST by AD from SpringBay (We have the government we allow and deserve.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

Yes, the more the light is put on these people the better. I notice how resentment against the Christian peacemakers is growing in Britain and Canada as the appalling lack of gratitude and manners is demonstrated for the whole world to see.


14 posted on 03/25/2006 4:59:14 AM PST by Patriot from Philly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Because he's not a Republican?


15 posted on 03/25/2006 4:59:19 AM PST by Lord Basil (Hate isn't a family value; it's a liberal one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AD from SpringBay
Bill Clinton is almighty! Glory to his name. Thou shalt bow bown before him thrice a day. Thou shalt not sully his name. Thou shalt not comingle fact with his history. Thou shalt applaud his every step.

And if thou's name is Monika 'thou shalt ......' Oops, better not go there...

16 posted on 03/25/2006 5:05:24 AM PST by eeriegeno
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: gotribe

Ask Bill Cosby.


17 posted on 03/25/2006 5:06:47 AM PST by johnny7 (“Nah, I ain’t Jewish, I just don’t dig on swine, that’s all.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Good post johnny and you are correct.


18 posted on 03/25/2006 5:09:01 AM PST by Joe Boucher (an enemy of islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Oh please. Clinton was busy getting a BJ. Why can't he come in piece?


19 posted on 03/25/2006 5:15:35 AM PST by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Don't you know that Bill Clinton can do no wrong in the eyes of the MSM


20 posted on 03/25/2006 5:15:50 AM PST by chainsaw ( ("We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good." - H. Clinton))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson