Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

After 2 More Deaths, Planned Parenthood Alters Method for Abortion Pill
www.nytimes.com ^ | March 18, 2006 | GARDINER HARRIS

Posted on 03/20/2006 5:40:00 AM PST by Pharmboy

WASHINGTON, March 17 — After receiving reports that two more women died after taking abortion pills, Planned Parenthood, the nation's largest provider of abortion and contraceptive services, announced that it would immediately change the way it gives the medicines.

The change partly resolves a long-running dispute between Planned Parenthood and the Food and Drug Administration over the safest way to provide pill-based abortions.

The F.D.A. has now received reports that six women in the United States died after taking RU-486, or Mifeprex. A seventh died in Canada. The two most recent deaths and two of the previous four underwent their procedures at Planned Parenthood clinics, a spokeswoman said.

Federal officials do not yet know the cause of the latest two deaths. The previous four resulted from systemic infections with a virulent bacteria, Clostridium sordellii. Planned Parenthood announced in a statement that one of the two recent deaths occurred within days of the victim's undergoing a pill-based abortion, while the other woman died within five weeks.

Mifeprex has been used in more than 560,000 medical abortions in the United States and more than 1.5 million in Europe. The risks of death from infection after using the pill are similar to the risks after surgical abortions or childbirth, drug agency officials said.

When Mifeprex was first approved by the agency in 2000, the standard regimen was to give the drug in a doctor's office followed two days later by an oral dose of a different drug, misoprostol, also in a doctor's office. Women expelled the fetus over the following days or weeks in a process that mimicked a miscarriage. The procedure must begin within 49 days of conception.

Soon after Mifeprex's approval, most Planned Parenthood doctors switched to a different regimen, instructing women to insert misoprostol vaginally at home two to three

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: abortiondeaths; abortions; plannedabortionhood; ru486
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last
This is new...PP seems interested in the health of the mother.
1 posted on 03/20/2006 5:40:03 AM PST by Pharmboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Here we go again... it should be '4 more deaths'!


2 posted on 03/20/2006 5:40:54 AM PST by YouPosting2Me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

How long will it be before Planned Parenthood replaces their mantra against the many deaths due to, "back alley abortions" with warnings about the increasing abortion related deaths caused by, "pharmaceutical greed"?


3 posted on 03/20/2006 5:47:22 AM PST by finnigan2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Off-label usage after warnings, a systemic plan to ignore the FDA? What are the surviving family members going to do with all the PP offices they'll own once the ambulance chasers get done with PP?


4 posted on 03/20/2006 5:51:54 AM PST by NonValueAdded ("If I were a Cuban, I'd certainly be on a raft," Isane Aparicio Busto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
I see big time lawsuits in Plan Parenthood's future by ignoring the warnings
5 posted on 03/20/2006 5:54:25 AM PST by Mo1 ("Stupidity is also a gift from God, but it should not be abused." Pope John Paul II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

If this was any other drug they'd be yanking it off the market.


6 posted on 03/20/2006 6:00:00 AM PST by Smittie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Smittie
"If this was any other drug they'd be yanking it off the market."

Exactly. If I were in Walmart management, I would require a waiver be signed by anyone wanting to purchase this drug, just to avoid any lawsuite -- which are certain to follow. Just why Walmart caved in and agreed to sell this is beyond any common sense.

7 posted on 03/20/2006 6:25:24 AM PST by TommyDale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

What's a few more deaths when you're swimming in a sea of death. It's all for the cause. Gotta keep the abortion industrial complex running.


8 posted on 03/20/2006 6:26:23 AM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale; Smittie

Good point.


9 posted on 03/20/2006 6:27:39 AM PST by beaversmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Coleus

ping


10 posted on 03/20/2006 6:28:09 AM PST by Calpernia (Breederville.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

I wonder if someone at PP was trained by Kevorkian?


11 posted on 03/20/2006 6:30:01 AM PST by sidegunner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Is this the drug they were trying to get from perscription to over-the-counter?


12 posted on 03/20/2006 6:41:05 AM PST by A Balrog of Morgoth (With fire, sword, and stinging whip I drive the RINOs in terror before me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
Soon after Mifeprex's approval, most Planned Parenthood doctors switched to a different regimen, instructing women to insert misoprostol vaginally at home two to three days after taking Mifeprex. Studies of the new regimen showed that it was effective, and it allowed women to take lower doses of misoprostol. It also meant fewer office visits for Planned Parenthood.

But this regimen was not approved by the drug agency. It is not unusual for doctors to use drugs differently from how they are officially approved. But as reports of deaths among women undergoing the procedure trickled into the F.D.A., government officials issued stern warnings that doctors should stick to the approved regimen.

Until Friday, Planned Parenthood had rejected those warnings.

Doesn't take a genius to realize PP is in for a number of wrongful death lawsuits.

Ironic, isn't it? Wrongful death.

13 posted on 03/20/2006 6:49:55 AM PST by Balding_Eagle (REAL men vote Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

Hmmmmm... call me a nutjob whacko if you want, but I view the death of a woman aborting her baby as poetic justice - kind of like nature's own version of the death penalty. I'm perfectly ok with this and would encourage PP to continue offing their clientele.


14 posted on 03/20/2006 6:55:05 AM PST by Capagrl (Never argue with stupid people; they drag you down to their level and beat you with experience.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy

I argued not to long ago in a class I was taking when a girl did her presentation on abortion pills that they arent as safe as she says they are and that in fact there have been many complications, including excessive bleeding and deaths attributed to the pill.The only answer I got was that they could find no evidence to that fact.


15 posted on 03/20/2006 7:03:27 AM PST by aft_lizard (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A Balrog of Morgoth

"Is this the drug they were trying to get from perscription (sic) to over-the-counter?"

No. The morning after pill is a higher dosage of regular birth control pills, and does not work on a pregnancy that is already established. RU-486 is mifepristol, which is used on established pregnancies up to the eighth week.

It's good of you to ask, since people on these boards seem to have strong opinions on the two drugs, at the same time that they confuse them.


16 posted on 03/20/2006 7:07:43 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pharmboy
So a pill designed to kill does. Nobody needs a medical degree to see that one coming.

Something I wonder. The pill came from Europe where it's been available for a while. One would think Planned Parenthood would be crowing from the rooftops about how "safe" it is using facts and figures from there. They would be beating about the head and neck with those stats. For some reason, they never mention it. Hmmm, I say.
17 posted on 03/20/2006 7:11:48 AM PST by Hillarys Gate Cult (The man who said "there's no such thing as a stupid question" has never talked to Helen Thomas.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linda_22003; A Balrog of Morgoth

"The morning after pill is a higher dosage of regular birth control pills, and does not work on a pregnancy that is already established."



While it is correct that RU-486 is not the same as the "emergency contraception" (or "morning-after pill") that has recently been in the news, it is not correct to state that the morning-after pill does not "work on a pregnancy that is already established" (i.e., does not abort an embryo). The morning-after pill is an extremely high dose of birth-control pills and it works in one of two ways: If the woman hasn't ovulated yet, it helps prevent ovulation (in which case it would not be abortive), but if the woman already ovulated and the egg is fertilized, it prevents the embryo from attaching to the uterine wall (which is certainly abortive). So the morning-after pill is a form of abortion that only works in the first few days after the embryo is formed (before implantation in the uterine wall), while RU-486 is a form of abortion that works even after implantation. They both kill the baby, but RU-486 can kill bigger babies.


18 posted on 03/20/2006 7:20:35 AM PST by AuH2ORepublican (http://auh2orepublican.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: beaversmom

Planned Parenthood, a murderous, leftist organization, is also swimming in a sea of our tax money. Why won't the government stop this permanent subsidy of death? This subsidy is incomprehensible to me. Shouldn't we be shouting at Congress and PP, "Hey, hey! How many babies did you kill today!"


19 posted on 03/20/2006 7:22:21 AM PST by Paulus Invictus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Paulus Invictus

Also, ask the administration why the budget proposed by the President maintains (and sometimes increases) the amount.


20 posted on 03/20/2006 7:25:40 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-69 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson