Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton advocates earned income tax credit in LR appearance
http://www.klfy.com/Global/story.asp?S=4651537 ^

Posted on 03/19/2006 1:34:41 AM PST by kcvl

Clinton advocates earned income tax credit in LR appearance

LITTLE ROCK Former President Bill Clinton visited a tax assistance session in a working-class Little Rock neighborhood today to encourage people to take advantage of the earned income tax credit. The tax help was being offered in the chapel meeting hall of Promiseland Church Ministries in southwest Little Rock. Clinton says he showed up at the afternoon session because he believes it is important to get the word out on the tax credit available to working people.

Clinton says the credit is the only tax cut on the books that is for working people.

Clinton said that last year, 55-thousand families in Arkansas who were eligible didn't apply for the credit.

Tomorrow, Clinton will bring the same message to residents in Gulfport, Mississippi, and Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

Copyright 2006 Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:

1 posted on 03/19/2006 1:34:43 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Promiseland Church Ministries

I guess it would only become a 'church & state' matter if Republicans appeared at church advocating for a tax credit. /sarcasm

2 posted on 03/19/2006 1:37:34 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; Mo1

I know that you could never guess it was a BLACK CHURCH...



http://promiselandchurchministries.org/?page=antoine&submenu=1



3 posted on 03/19/2006 1:40:53 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kcvl
Tomorrow, Clinton will bring the same message to residents in Gulfport, Mississippi, and Baton Rouge, Louisiana.

,,, trading in the temples there too?

4 posted on 03/19/2006 1:56:03 AM PST by shaggy eel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

The earned income tax credit is not a "tax cut" it is a "welfare payment" designed to buy votes.

If you get back more than you payed into the IRS you are part of the problem.

Around here people know just how much they can earn a year and still get their check. They stop working around Oct/Nov so they can get their "earned" money.


5 posted on 03/19/2006 3:38:37 AM PST by PeteB570 (Guns, what real men want for Christmas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

He must have been in town to check out the new masseuse at the library.


6 posted on 03/19/2006 4:52:38 AM PST by Past Your Eyes (You knew the job was dangerous when you took it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

I'd like to see Clintons income tax records.

You can bet there's some slick tricks pulled on that one.

Wonder if he and his Dyke companion file jointly or separate.


7 posted on 03/19/2006 5:10:26 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeteB570

The earned income tax credit came from the Reagan Administration. (I am a big time Reaganite.) The idea was good ... but like every other government program, it has been twisted into something else.

The idea was back in the mid-80's ... poor people have a choice. They can work a low paying job or go on welfare. Many were choosing welfare because they could make more than they could with their minimum wage job. The Reagan admin reasoned, it's better for people to work, even at minimum wage because sooner or later they will move up and out of the minimum wage level. There's no chance if they continue on welfare.

So, they reasoned, let's give them an "earned income tax credit", actually a reverse tax that makes sure that while they continue to work, their net income will equal or exceed what they would get through welfare. In theory, a good idea ... inducing more people to work, especially people who would get a government handout anyway if they were not working.

As I said, in theory, a good idea. In reality, not so good. Although some may do as you suggest, work to a point in the year and then quit, the real abuse comes from shacking up. The EITC greatly hinders marriage. Each partner in the arrangement is working a low paying job and collecting the EITC by filing a false tax return showing they are not living at the same address. This lets one "family" collect two EITC's. And of course the government typically does not chase these people down for their false IRS return. Maybe the EITC helps a little because the people do have jobs, but we are paying a lot more for it than the program ever intended.


8 posted on 03/19/2006 6:13:10 AM PST by JohnEBoy (AT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson