To: Pikamax
"Some people believe the answer to this problem is to wall off our economy from the world," he said this month in India, talking about the migration of U.S. jobs overseas. "I strongly disagree."Is this writer so freaking thick that she actually believes that speaking this way is somehow deceptive? It's merely a convenient tool of rhetoric--does she actually expect him to explain every nuance of every single argument opposing his policies in his speeches? No--you just slap a label on the other side and go to town. People've been doing this as long as people have been communicating.
Of course, this reporter will soon be writing about every single other politician who does this--Ted Kennedy claiming Robert Bork will bring us back to the days of back alley abortions, for example--unless, of course, she claims Bush is the ONLY politician who does this, in which case she is even more guilty of this tactic than is the President.
22 posted on
03/18/2006 2:55:05 PM PST by
Darkwolf377
(No respect for conservatives? That's free speech. No respect for liberals? That's hate speech.)
To: Darkwolf377
The other implied subtext of course in Bush is a liar and no one should trust anything he says. While of course the Democrats wear halos like saints do and you can always rely on them to tell the truth. That's really what you're getting at, isn't it Ms. Loven? Very subtle.
(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")
29 posted on
03/18/2006 3:01:58 PM PST by
goldstategop
(In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
To: Darkwolf377
50 posted on
03/19/2006 5:07:18 PM PST by
Carling
(RIP Kirby Puckett - Another Part Of My Childhood Dies)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson