Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Proud_USA_Republican
yes and no. Gold has had a big run the past year, but it wasn't because the dollar was tanking hard in the opposite direction. Gold and the dollar are less pegged to each other than it used to be.

I was suggesting (and I still insist) that the writer had made a slip of pen or keystroke; and it's obviously the case, even in consideration of what you say. Your statements are valid, but do not invalidate mine in any way. Point blank: if gold's price rises, it takes more dollars to buy it -- no ifs ands or buts. The only possible exception would be if you were doing an apples and oranges thing in which someone said "gold is rising against the peso" (for example), because the peso has radically fallen, even more so, against the dollar, while gold was simultaneously falling vs. the dollar. Now that's confusing, but it is the only way you could say gold has risen in value (albeit against someone else's currency), yet it doesn't take more dollars to buy it.

25 posted on 03/17/2006 8:44:40 AM PST by Migraine (...diversity is great (until it happens to you)...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]


To: Migraine

I agree. I do think the writer made a mistake in the language, but I know what he was trying to get at.


26 posted on 03/17/2006 9:36:30 AM PST by Proud_USA_Republican (We're going to take things away from you on behalf of the common good. - Hillary Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson