Posted on 03/16/2006 1:12:21 PM PST by theworkersarefew
Long-suppressed tensions among House Republicans burst into full public view yesterday when 29 conservatives voted against the rules for floor debate on a $91 billion emergency spending bill for the Iraq war and Gulf Coast recovery.
The fate of the rule was never in doubt — Rep. John Murtha (Pa.) led 22 of his fellow Democrats in helping GOP leaders defeat the conservative rebellion — but the open infighting comes at a bad time for House Republicans, many of whom are increasingly worried about November’s midterm election.
Despite its failure to alter the massive spending bill, which the House is expected to pass today, the conservative insurrection portends trouble for Republican leaders as they try to move budget and spending bills.
“It was a strong signal from House conservatives that a number of us are willing to do whatever it takes to slow spending,” said Rep. Jeff Flake (R-Ariz.), who voted against the rule.
Some aides saw the rule revolt as a test of the relationship between new Majority Leader John Boehner (R-Ohio) and the conservative Republican Study Committee (RSC).
Rep. John Shadegg (R-Ariz.), a former RSC chairman and a key Boehner supporter after his own leadership campaign fell short, voted against the rule.
Members of the RSC wanted to have separate votes on defense accounts and money for the hurricane-battered Gulf Coast. Ultimately, they were looking for a way to offset Gulf Coast spending with cuts to other programs. But they ran into a thicket of political and procedural obstacles, pitting them against appropriators, with Boehner in between.
After several days of proposals and counterproposals, mediated primarily by Boehner, Republicans on both sides pointed fingers and accused each other of reneging on earlier deals to resolve the dispute.
“It’s unfair to make members of Congress choose between our troops and fiscal discipline,” said Rep. Mike Pence (R-Ind.), chairman of the RSC. “That’s the choice that our colleagues are faced with this week.”
But Boehner’s intervention was a relief to some Republicans who worried that the absence of forceful former Majority Leader Tom DeLay (R-Texas) could be disastrous. The episode “speaks volumes to Boehner’s leadership,” one House Republican aide said.
The leadership-backed rule included protections for an amendment simply to strike all of the Gulf Coast recovery programs, which amount to $19 billion. But that option, which could have difficulty garnering majority support, did not satisfy the RSC.
Pence rose during the weekly Republican Conference meeting yesterday and announced that he was going to vote against the rule and recommend other members follow suit. Soon after, RSC aides circulated an e-mail to committee members and staff outlining reasons to vote against the rule.
“Contrary to others’ assertions, there was no deal with the RSC,” the e-mail read in part.
Organized defiance on procedural votes is rare in a Republican Conference that has maintained its tight grip on the legislative process by emphasizing party discipline. But conservatives say their party has lost its way amid continuing deficits and mounting national debt. Under Pence’s leadership, the RSC has been increasingly willing to go head to head with leadership.
Several RSC members made it plain yesterday that this will not be their last stand on procedural matters.
“There will be other votes in the future where Democrats are less inclined to support rules,” Pence said.
Murtha, the target of Republican attacks when he called for a quick redeployment of American troops last year, has long worked with Republican leaders when they need Democratic votes to ensure smooth passage of spending bills.
“Jack will always stand up to support the troops, and that’s what he did today,” said Rep. David Hobson (R-Ohio), a member of the Appropriations Committee.
Some Senate conservatives are sure to echo their House counterparts’ call for offsetting the Gulf Coast money, but they seem unlikely to find a sympathetic ear in Senate Appropriations Chairman Thad Cochran (R-Miss.), whose home state was pounded by Hurricane Katrina.
Cochran, who is due to mark up his version of the legislation the first week of April, promised he would give colleagues “a fair hearing.” But he also made clear that he would prefer not to offset the money.
“The people of the Gulf Coast would say it’s a fine time to get conservative now, after running up some of the biggest deficits in the nation’s history,” said Sen. Mary Landrieu (D-La.).
Good for them. It is time to cut spending.
If not now, when?
“The people of the Gulf Coast would say it’s a fine time to get conservative now, after running up some of the biggest deficits in the nation’s history
Pence and the RSC was one of the few forces resisting the trend towards more spending. This is nothing new, they are just starting to get more aggressive and attract more attention.
The one selling point the Rs had was that they would be the anti-Ds. That when the Ds and their media allies put together lies to whip the public into a frenzy, the Rs were the ones who promised us they were the ones to oppose.
But now, this bunch just showed that they will *not* stop Schumer and Hilly. They will join with the Ds, and Schumer will go on Mike Savage, and all will be one big party. They will help the Ds power-grab. As long as the MSM can whip the public up with lies ("Bush Selling Ports To Arabs").
I don't see how I can possibly vote for an R this fall. It will be a vote for Hilly and Schumer.
The saddest part is that there are only 29 conservatives among 231 Republican Representatives.
This is absolutely sickening.
Akin
Chabot
Davis, Jo Ann
Flake
Forbes
Foxx
Franks (AZ)
Garrett (NJ)
Gohmert
Green (WI)
Gutknecht
Hayworth
Hefley
Hensarling
Hostettler
Jones (NC)
King (IA)
Lungren, Daniel E.
Musgrave
Neugebauer
Otter
Pence
Poe
Ryan (WI)
Ryun (KS)
Shadegg
Stearns
Tancredo
Westmoreland
This is absolutely sickening.
It certainly is.
Here's hoping you get that chance!
I fear for the R Congress this fall.
Here's hoping you get that chance!
Thanks, I think he has a very good shot in the primaries.
You state that as though you are surprised.
bttt
Not surprised, just depressed. It's the best you can expect when your biggest selling point is that at least you aren't a Democrat.
Can they even say that anymore?
The way they jumped on the Ports deal?
If the MSM uses lies to whip up a public frenzy, they will back whatever plan to expand govt control of a private business deal Schumer and Hilly come up with?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.