[Millee]

I don't know, but (I know I'm gonna get flamed for this) the dad/sperm donor is 64 years old. The surrogate mom is 31. I think the kids are better off with her then "dad".

[Ouderkirk]

I kinda thought that too. Dad's 64? and the mom to be is 61? So by the standard life expectancy the kids will be 10 when dad kicks off and 17 when mom kicks.

I know that the so-called father has some legal standing here and the egg donor has some too. But the surrogate at least to me has absolutely no standing other than possession being 9 tenths of the law.

[TET1968]

"I don't know, but (I know I'm gonna get flamed for this) the dad/sperm donor is 64 years old. The surrogate mom is 31. I think the kids are better off with her then "dad"."


That is the most.......stop.

[Onelifetogive]

The surrogate mom is 31. I think the kids are better off with her then "dad".

Also...

...involve multiple parties, including egg donor Jennifer Rice, a Texas college student who sued for parental rights

Don't forget the egg-donor. The "mom" had NO biological relationship to the kids. Why does she get to keep them. What if I took someone's child from the hospital? Would having "possession" of them give me an advantage in court? These babies were cooked in her, but she didn't provide the ingredients.....