Skip to comments.
Some doubt safety of wireless
The Daily Pennsylvanian ^
| March 14, 2006
| eric chen
Posted on 03/14/2006 8:06:26 PM PST by Denver Ditdat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
"If there is definitive data that zero risk is involved, we'll certainly proceed with deployment. But the jury is still out on this one," he said.
News flash - John Travolta has landed the coveted role of Frederick Gilbert, President of Lakehead University -
To: 1066AD; 1ofmanyfree; AlexW; ASOC; bigbob; Brian Allen; BushCountry; Calamari; CenTex; ...
Ham Radio Ping ListPlease Freepmail me if you want to be added to or deleted from the list.
2
posted on
03/14/2006 8:06:59 PM PST
by
Denver Ditdat
(Melting solder since 1975)
To: Denver Ditdat
They'll soon be replacing all the "No Smoking" signs with "No Networking" signs.
3
posted on
03/14/2006 8:12:50 PM PST
by
thoughtomator
(Nobody would have cared if the UAE wanted to buy Macy's...)
To: Denver Ditdat
Newsflash: Some doubt earth is round and the heliocentric solar system theory.
4
posted on
03/14/2006 8:16:04 PM PST
by
ExpatGator
(Progressivism: A polyp on the colon politic.)
To: Denver Ditdat
It's not as if they are transmitting 5 million watts of power, for Pete's sake. Funny, no one seems to care if they live near a TV transmitter, or microwave relay station, or under massive power lines. But Heaven forbid if they use a little
802.11 device that only carries for 300 feet maximum.
5
posted on
03/14/2006 8:16:21 PM PST
by
TommyDale
To: TommyDale
I scanned through the article pretty quickly but did not see the magic words that will immediately return us to the strictly wired universe: "Could be harmful for pregnant women and thier babies."
6
posted on
03/14/2006 8:20:53 PM PST
by
LK44-40
To: LK44-40
These idiots worried about radio waves have been around for awhile. Same mentality as loons who think that somebody is sending subliminal messages through radio waves. They belong in mental institutions.
To: Denver Ditdat
8
posted on
03/14/2006 8:31:59 PM PST
by
Bratch
To: Denver Ditdat
Hmmm - years and years ago I used to engineer as an undergrad for WXPN AM and FM "The Radio Voice of the University of Pennsylvania" - we had limited-power AM transmitters located around campus and the only danger I recall from that setup was that once in awhile the signal would hop to the trolley wires and broadcast to parts of Philly where it wasn't supposed to be - can't believe that wireless internet would be more hazardous.......
To: Denver Ditdat
10
posted on
03/14/2006 8:55:24 PM PST
by
HuntsvilleTxVeteran
(“Don't approach a Bull from the front, a Horse from the rear, or a Fool from any side.”)
To: Denver Ditdat
Time to get the tinfoil hat. :)
11
posted on
03/14/2006 9:13:30 PM PST
by
Ptarmigan
(Proud bunny hater and killer)
To: Denver Ditdat
Time to get the tinfoil hat. :)
12
posted on
03/14/2006 9:13:33 PM PST
by
Ptarmigan
(Proud bunny hater and killer)
To: Denver Ditdat
Lakehead ... how many Nobel prize winners from that foine Canuckistani youniversitty?
Every Canadian knows what a joke Lakehead U is...
13
posted on
03/14/2006 9:18:29 PM PST
by
ikka
To: Denver Ditdat
Wireless Internet networks are cropping up in coffee shops, campuses and even entire cities, and though you can't see or feel them, one man thinks they are dangerous. Sunlight is dangerous... So what?
14
posted on
03/14/2006 9:25:57 PM PST
by
tomzz
To: Denver Ditdat
More MSM alarmism. Holding a cell phone next to your brain is far more dangerous than a lousy 100 milliwatt signal 30 feet away.
15
posted on
03/14/2006 9:57:17 PM PST
by
Wiseghy
("You want to break this army? Then break your word to it.")
To: Denver Ditdat
Lessee what was that we used to call them? Oh yeah Indians. We have a bunch in Eugene too who are always right there to protest every new cell tower and somehow Clearwire came in and built up and was operational before the bunch knew what hit them.
I don't use Clearwire but we have 802.11g wireless in the house hooked to the DSL and I love the built in wireless in the laptop. And I haven't noticed any ill effects (well, with my pants off I don't need to turn on the light to find my way to the bathroom at night but that's not a bad thing - is it? Maybe I should call the dogcatcher and see if he thinks there might be something wrong).
16
posted on
03/14/2006 10:18:43 PM PST
by
Clinging Bitterly
(Oregon - a pro-militia and firearms state that looks just like Afghanistan .)
To: Ptarmigan
To: Denver Ditdat
Finishing its network construction is expected to cost Penn $700,000. I will do it for a half of price, twice as good and safe even to idiot scientwists. Stuck on ssssstooopid with pH Duuuuh!
To: Denver Ditdat
Gilbert, who holds a doctorate in zoology, said that people exposed to such waves may be at risk for nausea, fatigue and even brain cancer. steve-b, who holds a degree in computer engineering, says that people exposed to such nitwittery may be at risk for bafflement, loss of composure, and even split sides.
19
posted on
03/15/2006 6:29:30 AM PST
by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
To: Wiseghy
Holding a cell phone next to your brain is far more dangerous than a lousy 100 milliwatt signal 30 feet away. Originally, I thought that Frederick Gilbert would have no reason to hold a cell phone next to his brain, but then I remembered that he talks out his ass.
20
posted on
03/15/2006 6:31:49 AM PST
by
steve-b
(A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-28 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson