Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ex Supreme Court Justice O'Connor Bashes Pro-Life Advocates on Terri Schiavo
LifeNews.com ^ | March 13, 2006 | by Steven Ertelt

Posted on 03/13/2006 12:30:47 PM PST by EternalVigilance

Washington, DC (LifeNews.com) -- Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor used a speech at Georgetown University to attack pro-life lawmakers who sided with Terri Schiavo's parents in their efforts to prevent their daughter's euthanasia death. She claimed a Congressional effort to have federal courts review the case was a first step towards a dictatorship.

O'Connor, who backs abortion, announced her retirement last year and was recently replaced by federal appeals court judge Samuel Alito, who pro-life advocates hope will be more open to upholding laws that protect the right to life.

"We must be ever-vigilant against those who would strong-arm the judiciary," she said of the pro-Terri Schiavo lawmakers.

"It takes a lot of degeneration before a country falls into dictatorship, but we should avoid these ends by avoiding these beginnings," O'Connor said, pointing to Communist countries and autocracies around the world.

After a local Florida judge reaffirmed his decision to allow Terri's former husband to take her life, some pro-life lawmakers said it may be appropriate to impeach such judges.

According to a London Guardian news report, O'Connor responded and said that such comments "pose a direct threat to our constitutional freedom."

"I want you to tune your ears to these attacks," she told the law students in attendance. "You have an obligation to speak up."

"Statutes and constitutions do not protect judicial independence -- people do," she added.

O'Connor also said that some Republican lawmakers are contributing to a climate of violence against judges by using harsh language to denounce certain decisions.

She was specifically referring to pro-life Sen. John Cornyn of Texas, who, after a judge was shot and killed in an Atlanta courtroom, said some judicial decisions may be prompting violent reactions.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: activistcourts; activistjudge; carterwantabe; cultureofbusybodies; cultureofdeath; deathcult; dummieindrag; eugenics; euthanasia; georgetownu; georgtownu; hemlocksociety; impeachment; judicialactivism; judicialtyranny; justgoaway; life; oconnor; parentalrights; parentsrights; righttolife; sandradayoconnor; schiavo; scotus; starvationnation; supremecourt; supremes; terri; terripalooza
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last

1 posted on 03/13/2006 12:30:51 PM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
a first step towards a dictatorship

yup. a dictatorship of life.

2 posted on 03/13/2006 12:33:14 PM PST by the invisib1e hand (now more skeptical than ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
I think I have an obligation to speak up when I see the State starving and dehydrating to death a fellow human being.

Some of us think that's a hell of a lot closer to dictatorship than allowing the parents to lovingly take care of the woman, you "international law" loving witch!

3 posted on 03/13/2006 12:33:15 PM PST by Yossarian (The media is now simply running a 24/7 soap opera with Dubya cast as the arch villain.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Boy! Now that she's out of work the old judge's mouth is like a loose cannon on a heaving deck.

Whoa! Watch out! Here she comes by for another pass!


4 posted on 03/13/2006 12:34:17 PM PST by RoadTest ("- - a popular government cannot flourish without virtue in the people." - Richard Henry Lee, 1786)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Waywardson; Broadside; Gelato
After a local Florida judge reaffirmed his decision to allow Terri's former husband to take her life, some pro-life lawmakers said it may be appropriate to impeach such judges...O'Connor responded and said that such comments "pose a direct threat to our constitutional freedom."

Guess she missed the part of the Constitution that allows for the impeachment of out-of-control judges.

That is, if she ever read it...

5 posted on 03/13/2006 12:35:21 PM PST by EternalVigilance (Your nation is being destroyed from within and without. What are you doing about it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yossarian

She was, and is an ass. You should read some of her decisions and attempt to comprehend them. Talk about convoluted logic.


6 posted on 03/13/2006 12:35:43 PM PST by Scotsman will be Free
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Killing the defenseless is one of her specialties.

To her, it's "dictatorship" to protect the lives of the defenseless.

What a pathetic excuse for a human being, must less a judge.


7 posted on 03/13/2006 12:35:57 PM PST by tomahawk (Proud to be an enemy of Islam)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

No wonder liberals loved her.


8 posted on 03/13/2006 12:35:58 PM PST by D-Chivas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

I wonder if Sandy's sick husband has put his wishes into writing.


9 posted on 03/13/2006 12:36:08 PM PST by A.A. Cunningham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
To compare what happened in Atlanta with people disagreeing with looney rulings by looney judges is so completely disingenuous - but certainly not surprising from the left.
10 posted on 03/13/2006 12:36:25 PM PST by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

I'm so glad O'Connor's no longer on the bench. Now that she's free to speak publicly, we're going to hear more of her confused and contradictory thinking.


11 posted on 03/13/2006 12:36:38 PM PST by American Quilter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: American Quilter

She's off the Supreme Court, but she oculd sit on another federal court. See here: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1595109/posts


12 posted on 03/13/2006 12:38:22 PM PST by NinoFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: the invisib1e hand

Good riddance, Judge O'Connor. You will NOT be missed.


13 posted on 03/13/2006 12:38:50 PM PST by freedom4me
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

She seems to be pretty loose with the dictatorship word. It makes me wonder if she's taking the path of Carter. Speaking out now that she can and not being responsible for the consequences.


14 posted on 03/13/2006 12:39:22 PM PST by jazusamo (:Gregory was riled while Hume smiled:)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

While O'Connor backs abortion, she refuses to endorse or back the US Constitution. Something wrong with this picture....


15 posted on 03/13/2006 12:39:33 PM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

"After a local Florida judge reaffirmed his decision to allow Terri's former husband to take her life, some pro-life lawmakers said it may be appropriate to impeach such judges.

According to a London Guardian news report, O'Connor responded and said that such comments "pose a direct threat to our constitutional freedom."

Shut up and croak.


16 posted on 03/13/2006 12:40:04 PM PST by BadAndy (I miss the days when people didn't celebrate their perversions.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

This woman is dangerous. I wonder if the remaining Justices will cut loose on her. Is she senile or early stages of alzheimers????


17 posted on 03/13/2006 12:40:25 PM PST by right right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
She doesn't realize that a 5-4 decision by an unelected tribunal is a dictatorship of the single deciding judge who breaks the tie. This speech demonstrates that she long ago lost her ability to reason on the basis of the Constitution.
18 posted on 03/13/2006 12:40:35 PM PST by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
Oh, my. I've been reading Livy's The Early History of Rome (highly recommended, BTW) and I've been impressed how hard it was for the early Romans to keep their republic once they got it. One aspect of maintaining their republic that they fought so hard to keep was the right to appeal. Without it, they assumed that whatever you call the leadership, it served as a dictatorship. Seems to me O'Connor is challenging the right to final appeal which to an early Roman citizen would have indicated that they lived under a dictator.
19 posted on 03/13/2006 12:40:38 PM PST by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Somebody tell her to go back to Arizona and shut her pie hole. We had enough O'Conner foolishness while she was on the court.


20 posted on 03/13/2006 12:42:18 PM PST by Busywhiskers (No matter how responsible he seems, never give your gun to a monkey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 161-163 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson