Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: CowboyJay
You got me on that one, Joe. Would they not have turned a profit in the long haul from assuming the leases, or were they just doing this pro-bono?

No, they would not have! Remember, Jay, those no-good Arabs were going to allow dirty bombs into our ports to destroy us. It was going to be worth the 6+ billion dollars just to see what it would do to our economy. This is precisely why the deal had to be killed, right, Jay?

260 posted on 03/12/2006 7:16:25 AM PST by LowCountryJoe (I'm a Paleo-liberal: I believe in freedom; am socially independent and a borderline fiscal anarchist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies ]


To: LowCountryJoe

"This is precisely why the deal had to be killed, right, Jay?"

The reason the deal had to be killed was to send a message that our nation still has enough self-sufficiency and self-respect not to allow a kingdom with strong 9/11 ties manage our ports operations for us.


262 posted on 03/12/2006 7:29:44 AM PST by CowboyJay (Rough Riders! Tancredo '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 260 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson