We don't know for 100% what caused Mrs. Reeve's lung cancer, but second-hand is not bullcrap, it did kill my grand-aunt who was in a house full of smokers and never once fired one up herself. At least she lived to almost 90.
The heck it ain't. Even the WHO (no, not the rock band) debunked second-hand smoke years ago.
it did kill my grand-aunt who was in a house full of smokers and never once fired one up herself. At least she lived to almost 90
But she lived a relatively long life though, so that point is moot.
"it did kill my grand-aunt who was in a house full of smokers and never once fired one up herself. At least she lived to almost 90."
Isn't that a bit of a stretch?? I'd say your great-aunt died of old age natural causes.
I don't think anything 'killed' Dana. It was her time to go and she did!!
So it couldn't have been old age, then, could it? Got to find some way to blame the smoke.
If she lived to almost 90, then I doubt it was so-called secondhand smoke that did her in. Can you prove she would have lived longer if she had never been exposed to it? That would be the only way you could prove an absolute link between the two.
The lack of clear logic on this subject is astounding. The technical term is "post hoc ergo propter hoc", meaning "after this therefore because of this". Assuming that the first event is directly causal of the second event, based on sequence.