Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Oscar ratings off, but not all-time low (Hollywood Extinction Alert)
Marketwatch.com ^ | March 6, 2006 | Russ Britt

Posted on 03/06/2006 12:10:29 PM PST by abb

LOS ANGELES (MarketWatch) -- Preliminary figures from Sunday night's Academy Awards telecast indicate ratings for the awards extravaganza were down versus the past two years' but still ahead of 2003's ratings.

The Walt Disney Co. (DIS) network ABC said the awards show got a 27.1 household rating, reflecting the percentage of total households watching the telecast. It also attracted a 40 share, representing the percentage of homes with televisions on that were tuned to the awards show.

On an inflation-adjusted basis, no field of best-picture nominees in years had done as poorly at the box office as this year's entries.

By comparison, the telecast got a 30.1 household rating with a 43 share in 2005, while in 2004 it received a 29.8 rating with a 43 share. In 2003, right after the U.S. went to war in Iraq, the show received a 25.5 rating with a 37 share.

It was feared that ratings for this year's awards show, hosted by novice emcee Jon Stewart, could reach a new low. Collectively, the five best-picture nominees had taken in the lowest nominee-revenue total in several years. See full story.

Top-prize-winner "Crash" set an inflation-adjusted new low in U.S. box-office receipts of $53.4 million in comparison with best-picture winners stretching back at least a quarter of a century. In 1987, "The Last Emperor" took in $44 million, but inflation turns that figure into more than $74 million in 2006 dollars.

And "Crash" is long gone from theaters, so the film's post-Oscar bounce will come purely from home video. "Crash" was released in May.

The biggest box-office hit among the five was "Brokeback Mountain," which had taken in a relatively paltry $78 million in U.S. receipts through Sunday.

Near midday Eastern time Monday, ABC had yet to compile actual numbers of households tuned to the telecast. End of Story

Russ Britt is the Los Angeles bureau chief for MarketWatch.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: brokeassoscars; brokeback; hollyweird; hollywood; oscar; ratings
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last
Schadenfreude....
1 posted on 03/06/2006 12:10:33 PM PST by abb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: abb
The media lies. This was the lowest-ratings Oscars ever and not even their numbers massaging can hide it. Hollywood is indeed out of touch with America.

(Denny Crane: "I Don't Want To Socialize With A Pinko Liberal Democrat Commie. Say What You Like About Republicans. We Stick To Our Convictions. Even When We Know We're Dead Wrong.")

2 posted on 03/06/2006 12:13:07 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Surprised it topped the 2003 telecast.


3 posted on 03/06/2006 12:13:18 PM PST by Borges
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Brokeass Oscars


4 posted on 03/06/2006 12:14:18 PM PST by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

Here's Rooters' spin...

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) - Oscar organizers' fears of weak television ratings for an Academy Awards lacking in star power and box-office hits may about to be confirmed.

Preliminary figures released by Nielsen Media Research on Monday for ABC's 3 1/2-hour Oscar telecast capped by the surprise Oscar triumph of racial drama "Crash" indicate a ratings drop of about 10 percent from last year's ceremony.

Sunday night's broadcast, hosted for the first time by comedian Jon Stewart, drew an average household rating of 27.1 percent, which would be the lowest percentage of homes that has tuned into the Academy Awards since 2003, according to data Nielsen collected in the 55 largest U.S. TV markets.

By comparison, last year's Oscars ceremony, which crowned boxing film "Million Dollar Baby" as 2004's best picture, garnered an average household rating of 30.1.

More accurate national numbers are expected later on Monday measuring audience size according to the average number of individuals who watched the broadcast.

Nielsen ratings for the Oscars and other entertainment awards shows have been generally declining over the years. They have tended to be highest in years when films that packed the multiplexes also figured prominently at the Oscars.

That was not the case this year, as none of the five movies nominated for the top prize made much of an impact at the box office. And many of the performers nominated in the major categories, such as best actor winner Philip Seymour Hoffman, were hardly household names.

The Oscar-sponsoring Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences and the ABC network had hoped that Stewart, a popular host of cable TV's faux newscast "The Daily Show," could generate additional interest this year, especially among young viewers who make up the core of his fan base.

Still, the Oscars gave ABC, a unit of the Walt Disney Co., a welcome ratings boost over its network rivals on Sunday night. The pre-Oscar show and the ceremony itself together beat the combined competition in metered market ratings of CBS, NBC, Fox and WB by 36 percent during prime time.


5 posted on 03/06/2006 12:15:25 PM PST by abb (Because News Reporting is too important to be left to the Journalists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb

Seriously, how much could it possibly have cost to make Bareback Mountain?

Loafer lightener isn't THAT expensive is it?


6 posted on 03/06/2006 12:16:13 PM PST by subterfuge ("We're going to take things from you for the greater good..."---Hillary Rod-Ham Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

I think these are the overnight ratinngs in the big markets such as New York and LA.

Wait until they release the figures for the Red states... the ratings will suck.... big time.


7 posted on 03/06/2006 12:16:16 PM PST by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb

The numbers are also inflated as the other networks don't program anything worth watching. I decided to watch the Andy Griffith marathon.....I forgot how funny that show was....RIP Don Knotts.


8 posted on 03/06/2006 12:16:21 PM PST by Feiny ( "Why don't we go up to the old people's home and wax the steps? " ~ Barney Fife)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Typical dishonest liberal spin, why does anyone believe any of these frauds anymore???

"ONLY THE 2ND LOWEST RATINGS EVER!!"

Wow, are we supposed to be impressed that Hollyweird may have narrowly averted its lowest ratings of all time??

It's still clear that much of the public is turned off by the depravity, idiocy, and liberalism of much of Hollyweird. No amount of sympathetic media spin can wish away the facts......


9 posted on 03/06/2006 12:16:26 PM PST by Enchante (Democrats: "We are ALL broken and worn out, our party & ideas, what else is new?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb
End of Story

Indeed.

10 posted on 03/06/2006 12:17:36 PM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Most people never watched the movies nominated nor knew the nominees....


11 posted on 03/06/2006 12:18:30 PM PST by laney ((For GOD so loved the world..John 3:16))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: abb
ahh- how sweet it is,

Hollywood down

Recruiters on campus

students taping fascist professors

Brokeback got it's back broke...

12 posted on 03/06/2006 12:19:33 PM PST by maine-iac7 ("...BUT YOU CAN'T FOOL ALL THE PEOPLE ALL THE TIME." Lincoln)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Borges

During 2003 we were all wrapped up in the coming Iraq war. There is no such excuse this time. It is just a poor product.


13 posted on 03/06/2006 12:19:50 PM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: abb

By the way, I watched NONE of the Oscars. I was at a Marriott Courtyard last night and tuned into ESPN3. A whole night of Mike Tyson beating the bejezus out of his opponents. I turned off the TV prior to the last bout with Buster Douglas


14 posted on 03/06/2006 12:20:31 PM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop

I forgot they were on last night. I'm quite content to read a good book instead of watching these lowlife back biters try and impress each other.


15 posted on 03/06/2006 12:21:38 PM PST by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: abb

We'll have to wait for mediabistro to tabulate more accurate numbers & have them posted!

http://www.mediabistro.com/tvnewser/ratings/default.asp


16 posted on 03/06/2006 12:22:30 PM PST by SIRTRIS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

Thing is, a lot of people must have figured that Stewart would bash Republicans ... but Stewart actually bashed a lot of Hollywood sacred cows.


17 posted on 03/06/2006 12:22:50 PM PST by ikka
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: abb

>The pre-Oscar show and the ceremony itself together beat the combined competition in metered market ratings of CBS, NBC, Fox and WB by 36 percent during prime time.<

Because they made no effort to compete.There was nothing but reruns and low rated shows on TV last night.


18 posted on 03/06/2006 12:30:00 PM PST by Blessed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: abb

how does Hollywood reconcile feminism and "It's Hard Out Here for a Pimp" ?
hypocrites all.


19 posted on 03/06/2006 12:31:11 PM PST by Rakkasan1 (Muslims pray to Allah, Allah prays to Chuck Norris.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: subterfuge
Seriously, how much could it possibly have cost to make Bareback Mountain?

Loafer lightener isn't THAT expensive is it?

I'm assuming not much was spent on condoms either...

20 posted on 03/06/2006 12:31:29 PM PST by frogjerk (LIBERALISM: The perpetual insulting of common sense.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-89 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson