Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Is this news good for the White House? El Rushbo will probably be saying this to looks like a another victory for the Bush. [More Reports?] Bush was being quoted in AP reports saying outsourcing jobs to India is good for the American economy. I understand now: Outsourcing jobs overseas is good for America. Outsourcing our borders and ports is good for our national security. What's not to understand?
1 posted on 03/03/2006 7:59:37 AM PST by ex-Texan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: ex-Texan

Well if I put my house on the market and the highest bidder is a Muslim and I refuse to sell to him. I wonder what the government will do to me? Do you suggest that all current contracts with foriegn ownership of terminal berths be canceled, those terminals shut down and those Longshoremen layed off until an American stevedore company can buy the contracts?


2 posted on 03/03/2006 8:04:09 AM PST by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

Is this guy up for re-election?


3 posted on 03/03/2006 8:05:16 AM PST by Echo Talon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

America's new can't do motto. We can't do anything for ourselves.


4 posted on 03/03/2006 8:05:33 AM PST by cripplecreek (Never a minigun handy when you need one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

"To those who say my views smack of protectionism, I say: America is worth protecting."

That line of Hunter's is so lame. Did his staff spend a week coming up with it. I guess coming up with a slogan is easier than laying out the facts to support his case.


5 posted on 03/03/2006 8:05:50 AM PST by frankjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

Their example is 66 high speed electrical switches sold three years ago?

To a country that already has nuclear weapons?

I need more information, but this sounds like more hysterics rather that solid reasoning.


8 posted on 03/03/2006 8:08:35 AM PST by untrained skeptic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

I'm all for not working with most Muslim countries. What do we owe these people? Are any of them standing up in defiant support of the US? If not, forget 'em.


9 posted on 03/03/2006 8:08:56 AM PST by GianniV
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

Duncan Hunter is a liberal shill and a racist. /sarc


10 posted on 03/03/2006 8:13:01 AM PST by GOP_1900AD (Stomping on "PC," destroying the Left, and smoking out faux "conservatives" - Take Back The GOP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan
Bump.

Duncan Hunter is one of the most consistent pro-defense hawks still left in the Congress. Many of the rest of them have sold out, ....for the equivalent of 30 pieces of silver.

He has proven his courage countless times, standing up to those schilling for foreign governments.


11 posted on 03/03/2006 8:13:29 AM PST by Paul Ross (Hitting bullets with bullets successfully for 35 years!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

Using some random article to bash Rush, eh? Obviously you have already decided this article equals defeat for the White House. More power to you. And remember it when this deal goes through.


17 posted on 03/03/2006 8:17:09 AM PST by Coop (FR= a lotta talk, but little action)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

No matter on which side of this issue one stands, it is upsetting to read comments like these coming from the House Armed Services Committee Chairman who has not, as far as I can determine, expressed any concern about the fact that DPW provides virtually the exclusive support for our US Navy ships in the UAE ports of Jebel Ali and Fujairah. Those ports accommodate more US Navy ships than any other international port. DPW is also the primary support contractor for US Air Force assets at Al Dhafra Air Base in UAE.
Why would the Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee trust DPW to work closely with thousands of US military personnel and military vessels and aircraft, when he has expressed such extreme distrust of DPW's role in civilian operations? If DPW is such a danger to the security of US civilians, why is the same company viewed as a trusted partner by the US military?


20 posted on 03/03/2006 8:19:30 AM PST by OkeyDokeyOkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

This guy better tune into Rush Flim Flam who has the Bush administration marching orders. It's all ok...It's all good...The deal is already done....Dubai related operations have no security baggage associated with them. UAE is so on our side. Bush said so.... I feel better already.


26 posted on 03/03/2006 8:23:33 AM PST by putupjob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan
I'll bet if they outlaw unions at the ports, a US company would be willing to do it.

You think the Dems will go for that deal.

27 posted on 03/03/2006 8:23:35 AM PST by AmishDude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

Hunter's my Congressman. He's pretty good overall--but his staff has been buffaloed more than once by the Legacy Media-Political Complex.


28 posted on 03/03/2006 8:24:05 AM PST by BeHoldAPaleHorse (Tagline deleted at request of moderator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

Maybe the Congress will "federalize" the ship parking business, just think how many positions they can create opening every container that gets unloaded. (Sarcasm)

Liberals are in need of campaign funding the old fashion 'union' way.


29 posted on 03/03/2006 8:26:35 AM PST by Just mythoughts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan
UAE's DPW currently ILLEGALLY boycotting Israel. If the Ports Deal goes through, we will be effectively boycotting Israel (our only trusted long term ally on the War on Terror

Ah, what the hell does it matter. We are giving ourselves carte blanche to run Israel's foreign policy, giving large chunks of land to Hamas (who is financed and supported by the UAE).

Bush is looking to be Israel's worst best friend.
30 posted on 03/03/2006 8:27:50 AM PST by sully777 (wWBBD: What would Brian Boitano do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan; freepatriot32; PatrickHenry; LibertarianInExile

Re: The $6.8 billion takeover is now expected to be complete by next week, despite an ongoing 45-day security investigation by the U.S. government to address concerns about the company's ownership and possible vulnerability to terrorist infiltration.

The White House's Committee on Foreign Investment in the United States approved the deal in January without conducting the 45-day investigation required by law.



Can the President sidestep Congress constitutionally?


39 posted on 03/03/2006 8:34:43 AM PST by sully777 (wWBBD: What would Brian Boitano do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: ex-Texan

House Armed Services Committee Duncan Hunter said the United Arab Emirates has a "terrifying" record of allowing the transshipment of nuclear materials and weapons of mass destruction through its country to Pakistan, Iran and other countries.



Yep. Duncan Hunter a know nothing Bush hater from way back. Bet he spends all his time at DU.

(sarc tag)


46 posted on 03/03/2006 8:44:55 AM PST by trubluolyguy (Islam, Religion of Peace and they'll kill you to prove it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson