Skip to comments.
Burke wants to limit dog tie-ups to 2 hours
Chicago Sun Times ^
| March 2, 2006
| FRAN SPIELMAN
Posted on 03/02/2006 12:11:16 PM PST by george76
Chicago dog owners who tether their pets for hours on end without food or water would be reined in -- with a two-hour limit -- under a crackdown proposed Wednesday by the City Council's most powerful alderman.
"If dogs are tethered in this way, it makes them more likely to bite humans and makes them mean," said Finance Committee Chairman Edward M. Burke (14th).
"It's a question of cruelty to the animals. It's a question of responsible care of animals. If people own pets, they ought to treat them responsibly."
The Burke-championed ordinance introduced at Wednesday's City Council meeting would establish a two-hour time limit on tethering, with fines ranging from $100 to $500 for each offense.
In a blitzkrieg of proposals, Burke also took aim at the sale of gift cards, used cars and meat ...
(Excerpt) Read more at suntimes.com ...
TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: blitzkrieg; blitzkriegproposals; burke; chairman; chicago; chicagodogowners; committee; dog; eddieburke; edwardmburke; finance; financecommittee; owners; proposals; revenooers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
1
posted on
03/02/2006 12:11:19 PM PST
by
george76
To: george76
Yep, whenever I want to know anything about dogs I just ask a politician.
To: george76
""If dogs are tethered in this way, it makes them more likely to bite humans and makes them mean," said Finance Committee Chairman Edward M. Burke (14th). " So he wants them to run lose so they can bite people outside the yard or what?
3
posted on
03/02/2006 12:15:34 PM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
To: D.P.Roberts
Ed burke must not have anything important to do like clean up the rank corruption in the Daly democrat party
To: HairOfTheDog
Get a stopwatch if you own a dog in Chicago now...
5
posted on
03/02/2006 12:16:33 PM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
To: george76
"In further news today, Eddie Burke, the world's greatest expert on everything, enlightened us on gift cards, used cars, meat and how dogs think."
To: Abathar
so now people can sue the city of chicago in addition to the owner of that pit bull that had to be released??
7
posted on
03/02/2006 12:17:47 PM PST
by
GeorgiaDawg32
(Islam is a religion of peace and they'll behead 13 year old girls to prove it...)
To: Abathar
I'd prefer to have them fenced. Chaining a dog up does make it more aggressive to passer-by if it has those tendencies to begin with.
8
posted on
03/02/2006 12:17:57 PM PST
by
ahayes
To: george76
"If people own pets, they ought to treat them responsibly."
Can't argue there, stupid as this idea is.
9
posted on
03/02/2006 12:18:01 PM PST
by
Terpfen
(72-25: The Democrats mounted a failibuster!)
To: D.P.Roberts
In other words if you come home and there are chalk marks on the side of your doghouse you know the meter-maids are on to you.
10
posted on
03/02/2006 12:19:12 PM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
To: george76
I thought you were talking about dog knots. I've never seen one last TWO HOURS!
11
posted on
03/02/2006 12:20:45 PM PST
by
colorcountry
(Some folks wear their halos much too tight)
To: george76
So will they do this like they do cars, by painting lines on their paws and seeing if they moved in the last two hours?
To: Abathar
To: ahayes
If its a big dog a chain is better than a fence, my chow can jump a normal fence without breaking her stride if she wants, and a lot of people don't allow fences because of deed restrictions too.
14
posted on
03/02/2006 12:21:55 PM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
To: CharlesWayneCT
15
posted on
03/02/2006 12:22:45 PM PST
by
Abathar
(Proudly catching hell for posting without reading since 2004)
To: george76
Hell, let the dogs run free. Not much chance of getting bit by them. It's these damn run-a-muck politicians who should be chained up since they always end up putting the bite on everyone.
16
posted on
03/02/2006 12:22:54 PM PST
by
Ditto
To: D.P.Roberts
Can he find something important to worry about...like the underfunded City of Chicago retirement plans ?
17
posted on
03/02/2006 12:23:41 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: Abathar
Too bad.
A chain contributes to aggression by frustrating the dog. It can see someone walking by on what it considers its territory, but it can't run them off because something holds it back. If there is a physical barrier it doesn't seem to aggravate them as much.
18
posted on
03/02/2006 12:27:25 PM PST
by
ahayes
To: Abathar
Are they going to install dog parking meters ?
19
posted on
03/02/2006 12:27:48 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
To: CharlesWayneCT
Burke will hire thousands of his new, best friends to be dog watchers.
20
posted on
03/02/2006 12:29:36 PM PST
by
george76
(Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-37 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson