Skip to comments.
Japanese brands dominate list of top cars in U.S.
Waterbury Republican-American ^
| March 2, 2006
| Dee-Ann Durbin (A.P.)
Posted on 03/02/2006 6:09:12 AM PST by Graybeard58
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-174 next last
To: Graybeard58
That's strange because I would take a Porsche or Audi over a Nissan any day of the week.
2
posted on
03/02/2006 6:11:18 AM PST
by
soccer_maniac
(Do some good while browsing FR --> Join our Folding@Home Team# 36120: keyword: folding@home)
To: Graybeard58
It's a conspiracy! They produce good products, at a fair price, in a nefarious plot to sell more cars than Ford and General Motors.
3
posted on
03/02/2006 6:14:12 AM PST
by
.cnI redruM
(Spreading liberal beliefs is as wrong as spreading AIDS.)
To: .cnI redruM
"I would take"
There is the key
4
posted on
03/02/2006 6:16:31 AM PST
by
DAC22
To: soccer_maniac
That's strange because I would take a Porsche or Audi over a Nissan any day of the week.What's stranger is that most real-world human beings can't affort the double-the-price...
5
posted on
03/02/2006 6:17:12 AM PST
by
Publius6961
(Multiculturalism is the white flag of a dying country)
To: Graybeard58
This report is a bunch of crap because it is well known that consumer reports is notoriously bigoted against the big three.
The same minivan with a asain badge off the same assembly line when badged as a Mercury got much lower rankings.
They are a bunch of asain car fanatics, and these findings are worthless.
To: Publius6961
7
posted on
03/02/2006 6:25:42 AM PST
by
maxter
To: soccer_maniac
I would definitely take a Lamborghini Murcielago over a Honda Civic. Any day.
8
posted on
03/02/2006 6:26:44 AM PST
by
MatD
To: Graybeard58
Mercury in the top ten? LOLOLOLOLOL!!!!!
I owned one and it was horrible. My friend's was even worse. Never again.
9
posted on
03/02/2006 6:28:52 AM PST
by
Hoodlum91
(pcottraux says I'm special!)
To: soccer_maniac
I would take a Porsche or Audi Those are enthusiast cars, not transportation.
CR is all about pedestrian functionality, economy, safety and reliability.
What's sad is that Detroit's consumer staple sedans, SUVs and minivans didn't fare better.
10
posted on
03/02/2006 6:29:33 AM PST
by
xsrdx
(Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
To: brainstem223
It's funny you should mention that. I'm currently driving an SUV with nearly 300,000 miles on it. It was made by Ford in Kentucky, but it's actually called a Mazda. The Mazda was slightly less expensive than the Ford with identical options (I think this was because they offered the Mazda with only a few specific option packages), and was a much better deal because the standard Mazda warranty was better than Ford's.
But as far as reliability is concerned, I can't imagine that the Mazda would be any better than the Ford.
To: Graybeard58
12
posted on
03/02/2006 6:29:38 AM PST
by
Tribune7
To: Temple Owl
13
posted on
03/02/2006 6:30:04 AM PST
by
Tribune7
To: Publius6961
We just purchased a used Suzuki Side Kick 4x4 and love it. Its the perfect the local run around town vehicle. We're looking for another one. It was cheap but who cares as long as its fun to drive and is good on gas.
14
posted on
03/02/2006 6:30:47 AM PST
by
Bringbackthedraft
(If we do not learn from history we are doomed to repeat it. But then again, it repeats regardless.)
To: Graybeard58
Rating reliability based on something like "problems per 100 vehicles) may not be the best way to measure this. I would suspect that a more accurate indicator of a vehicle's reliability is its resale value at 1-year, 3-year, and 5-year intervals after purchase.
To: brainstem223
"They are a bunch of asain car fanatics, and these findings are worthless."
You're 100% correct. What's even more interesting is that Freepers will revel in this report and not stop to consider that it was compiled by a group of tree hugging leftists.
16
posted on
03/02/2006 6:32:54 AM PST
by
brownsfan
(It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
To: Graybeard58
To: Graybeard58
I don't look at the things they look at.
And you simply can't get a deal on a Honda or Toyota.
Ford will win this war by cutting their labor costs by a third and then putting out road-worthy, but very cheap, automobiles.
Where I live in middle america, a 30,000 dollar car is half the price of a decent house and a third of the price of really nice house.
They should team with Hyundai/Kia in the way that GM did with the Geo.
Go with the 10 year 100,000 mile warranty and small buyers won't care that a Toyota will get 50,000+ more lifetime miles. They will care about a monthly payment they can afford attached to a 4 or 5 year loan.
18
posted on
03/02/2006 6:34:55 AM PST
by
xzins
(Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It. Pray for Our Troops!)
To: brownsfan
Fanatics, indeed. You will notice that any non-asian car is treated very harshly in their "reliability" (color dot) ratings. It is normal for them to rate a model with one or two trouble areas, and all the other areas average or better as "much worse than average".
The fact that Consumer Reports has a "green" category tells you all you need to know.
They should stick to testing washing machines, toasters, and granola bars.
19
posted on
03/02/2006 6:36:36 AM PST
by
Fresh Wind
(Democrats are guilty of whatever they scream the loudest about.)
To: Graybeard58
Ping to the GM/Ford Protectionist "we like our 70's quality American car" types out there.
Quality products attract buyers. Another lesson in ECO 101 for the Buchannites here on FR.
20
posted on
03/02/2006 6:36:57 AM PST
by
The South Texan
(The Democrat Party and the leftist (ABCCBSNBCCNN NYLATIMES)media are a criminal enterprise!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-174 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson