To: presidio9
This was so blatantly abuse of the RICO laws from the start. Why did it take 20 years?
3 posted on
03/01/2006 7:58:44 AM PST by
formercalifornian
(One nation, under whatever popular fad comes to mind at the moment, indivisible...)
To: formercalifornian
4 posted on
03/01/2006 7:59:56 AM PST by
Pyro7480
(Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
To: formercalifornian
Because "They're fierce. They're Feminists and they're in our faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaace!"
5 posted on
03/01/2006 8:00:26 AM PST by
massgopguy
(massgopguy)
To: formercalifornian
It depends upon who has the Presidency. If Gore were in power, we would have a stacked liberal Supreme Court, and this decision would have been split in favor of Rico actions against anti-abortion protesters. What should have alarmed people is that any judge in this land had ever upheld using RICO against protesters, yet they did!
9 posted on
03/01/2006 8:25:47 AM PST by
Enterprise
(The MSM - Propaganda wing and news censorship division of the Democrat Party.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson