Posted on 02/25/2006 8:18:56 AM PST by genefromjersey
Excellent Reason to Cancel UAE Port Deal : Justin Likes It !!
That lovable troll Justin Raimondo LIKES the idea of the UAE controlling our ports and says his counterparts on the Left (especially that awful , no-taste Arianna Huffington !) are PROFILING our poor Arab brethren.
Americas self-appointed Chief Copperhead has kind of a THING about Arabs apparently because they dont get along too well with Jews. He also likes Hugo Chavez, Slobodan Milosevic, and Saddam Hussein (So manly !)
In the event you are into self-punishment, here is a link to his latest bit of wit and wisdom :
http://antiwar.com/justin/
Enjoy !
Here's the link:
Excellent Reason to Cancel UAE Port Deal : Justin Likes It !!
That lovable troll Justin Raimondo LIKES the idea of the UAE controlling our ports and says his counterparts on the Left (especially that awful , no-taste Arianna Huffington !) are PROFILING our poor Arab brethren.
Americas self-appointed Chief Copperhead has kind of a THING about Arabs apparently because they dont get along too well with Jews. He also likes Hugo Chavez, Slobodan Milosevic, and Saddam Hussein
(So manly !)
In the event you are into self-punishment, here is a link to his latest bit of wit and wisdom :
http://antiwar.com/justin/
Enjoy !
Has Buchanan weighed in?
I think he must be torn, on the one hand he's an American First guy, on the other hand he seems to be an Arabphile.
Thanks. I guess "FR Search" is my friend, a neglected friend, but a friend none the less.
Justin is for but Buchanan is against, Carter is for but Schumer is against.
I feel like I stepped into some political twilight zone.
So does Jimmy Carter. .....but as consistently wrong as those two are it's still no reason to be against it, just as the fact that Pat Buchanan and Hillary Clinton are on the other side of the issue is no reason to be for it. The argument "so and so is either for it or against it so therefore my stance is justified" is no argument at all.
Actually, Justin Raimundo was a regular poster in FR during the Yugoslavia debacle. It was one of the few times we agreed with him. At that time he didn't seem to be against any and all wars, but only against clinton's war against the Serbs.
And we could agree with him that clinton's war against Belgrade was the wrong war, fought on the wrong side, for corrupt reasons. Oddly, the professional Republicans didn't seem to understand this, and still don't seem to understand it, so some of our best allies at that time were antiwar activists. Hardly anyone but antiwar activists and Freepers were attacking Maddy Albright in those years.
But I agree, he's an odd ally now. And I wouldn't trust him any farther than I could kick him.
What do you think about Jerome Corsi's take on this port situation?
I understand he was quite the hero of FR during the election. He has a book coming out in 4 weeks about the MinuteMenProject.
Here is his current article:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1585388/posts
From SourceWatch
Jerome R. Corsi co-authored the book Unfit for Command with John E. O'Neill which played a key role in the election year attack on the war record of Democratic Presidential hopeful John Kerry by the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth.
http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=Jerome_Corsi
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.