Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

Wrong. Maybe you didn't read the straddle that Charles has so nicely done in the article.


38 posted on 02/24/2006 4:02:43 AM PST by Peach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]


To: Peach
Maybe you didn't read the straddle that Charles has so nicely done in the article.

More kneejerk huffing and puffing. No "straddle" whatsoever, plainly; he states, in language transparent enough for any intellectually honest individual to readily grasp -- well: let's amend that to "almost any," in this particular instance -- that the port deal, in his estimation, should go through.

NOT "I don't know."

NOT "maybe it should, maybe it shouldn't."

"1) Allow the contract to go through; (2) give it heightened scrutiny by assigning a team of U.S. government agents to work inside the company at least for the first few years to make sure security is tight and information closely held; (3) have the team report every six months to both the executive and a select congressional committee."

Only someone well and truly in the grip of intellectual hysteria could possibly attempt to alchemize the above paragraph as a "straddle."

Make a cold compress. Go lie down, or something.

40 posted on 02/24/2006 4:11:39 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson