Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: TVenn

Lou Dobbs had a report tonight that disputes the administration's contention that the operating company has no part in security. His report pointed out that the operating company takes over security once the ship's cargo is unloaded onto the dock. The security arrangements, according to the report, are classified. Presumably, these arrangements would have to be shared with the operating company. It is ridiculous to claim that a few days of vetting are sufficient to okay this company to operate the ports and to be given access to secret security arrangements.

One expert on the Dobbs report pointed out that an individual doesn't get a security clearance until at least a year and a half of close scrutiny of his or her past.

The Bush administration can't possibly claim that there's nothing to worry about. After 9-11, that is an assertion the American people are not likely to believe.


14 posted on 02/23/2006 6:13:07 PM PST by WestSylvanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WestSylvanian

"Presumably, these arrangements would have to be shared with the operating company. It is ridiculous to claim that a few days of vetting are sufficient to okay this company to operate the ports and to be given access to secret security arrangements."

I believe it's been more than just a "few days of vetting." Do you know that this company operates ports all over the world, including Australia (a terrorist target)? Do you think the US is the only country with classified security arrangements? Do you think the UAE company became so well established by leaking these arrangements? Do you realize that it's American union workers carrying out this work? Do you realize that it still will be even after the deal goes through?

No one can claim that there's "nothing to worry about" (and Bush never said this, of course) no matter WHO takes over the job of managing our ports.


19 posted on 02/23/2006 6:19:26 PM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

To: WestSylvanian

Dubai Ports World is a business. It will make its acquisition of the British company successful by helping to prevent a terrorist attack in the U.S. There will be less risk with UAE ownership than there was with the British company, because the new owners have superior knowledge.


38 posted on 02/23/2006 6:45:18 PM PST by pleikumud
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson