FYI
1 posted on
02/22/2006 8:37:56 AM PST by
rcocean
To: rcocean
He should have made his speeches over here and he would have been ignored or glorified in the press.
2 posted on
02/22/2006 8:42:48 AM PST by
westmichman
(Please pray with me for global warming)
To: rcocean
I am not going to let anybody silence me.
Hey David Irving, I don't know about anyone else but I for one am not listening to you in the first place,
3 posted on
02/22/2006 8:43:09 AM PST by
isthisnickcool
(Jack Bauer: "By the time I'm finished with you you're going to wish you felt this good again".)
To: rcocean
He's an idiot. But he isn't breaking any law (IMHO).
Let the public and others scrutinize what he said publically. He will be proven the fool that he is.
4 posted on
02/22/2006 8:46:14 AM PST by
dhs12345
To: rcocean
Amusement continues. If David Irving didn't exist he'd have to be invented, he's serving so many needs here. Go Irving, Go!
7 posted on
02/22/2006 8:48:11 AM PST by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: rcocean
I completely support this guys freedom to espouse whatever nonsense he wants too. Fact is, Europia has less of those freedoms than we do, even with the evihl Patriot Act.
9 posted on
02/22/2006 8:49:06 AM PST by
Paradox
(Liberalism is Narcissism.)
To: rcocean
I love to watch when Irving is discussed over in DUmmie land. The hidden communist tendancies come through every time when half of them start demanding that this guy needed to be jailed and shut up for his opinion.
Their "freedom of speech" only extends to the speech they approve and it's interesting that most of them can't see why that's wrong.
10 posted on
02/22/2006 8:49:13 AM PST by
Gator101
To: rcocean
my problem with this is that he did the speeches in 89, and now recants what he stated back then. Why bother with the jail term they should have made him go on tour.
13 posted on
02/22/2006 8:52:00 AM PST by
ASH71
To: rcocean
More from the article:
You get wiser, it is not so much a change of heart as a refining of your position," he said.
"Every historian should do this, a lot of them don't, particularly in Germany and Austria, the historians are so frightened of being locked up in jail like me now."
Asked if he regretted the offence his views had caused, the historian replied:
"In my view freedom of speech means freedom to say to other people what they do not want to hear.
"If that causes offence, then that is partly their problem and partly mine. Freedom of speech is the right to be wrong basically. Sometimes I am wrong."
15 posted on
02/22/2006 9:02:37 AM PST by
rcocean
(Copyright is theft and loved by Hollywood socialists)
To: rcocean; sure_fine
"They are not going to succeed, I don't think."
Good, positive attitude, Irving moron.
To: rcocean
We're all seem to be missing the point, or the gist of the matter, if you prefer!![](http://photography.mojado.com/archives/3rdRail_041218w.jpg)
19 posted on
02/22/2006 10:01:42 AM PST by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: rcocean
He's already changed his mind.
What's he saying? That he won't change it again?
To: rcocean
Nobody will silence me.
Quoting Irving.
In the mind of Klackl,the prosecutor. "We have ways- of course".
You can take Colonel Klink out of Austria, but you cannot take Austria out of Colonel Klink.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson