Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Few Words on the Dubai Ports World Imbroglio (Lileks, As Always, NAILS It...!)
James Lileks' Screedblog ^ | 02/22/2006 | James Lileks

Posted on 02/21/2006 11:41:27 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

1 posted on 02/21/2006 11:41:30 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Alouette; SJackson; veronica; Slings and Arrows; TheBigB; martin_fierro

Ping


2 posted on 02/21/2006 11:42:05 PM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stellar Dendrite; Itzlzha; flashbunny; Travis McGee; NRA2BFree; Happy2BMe; Spiff; Pelham; ...

pong


3 posted on 02/21/2006 11:43:47 PM PST by flashbunny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
>>>>Advice to the administration: If you’re going to shoot yourself in the foot, don’t use a bazooka. You may aim for the pinky toe but there’s nothing left below the hip. The recoil should not be your first clue you grabbed the wrong gun.

Good stuff from James Lileks. I agree.

4 posted on 02/21/2006 11:47:33 PM PST by Reagan Man (Secure our borders;punish employers who hire illegals;stop all welfare to illegals)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
The recoil should not be your first clue you grabbed the wrong gun.

Bazookas don't recoil.

5 posted on 02/21/2006 11:54:22 PM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
And we thought W had lost it when he nominated Miers, or when he ignored us on the southern border...leave it to Bush to dig an ever deeper and more confounding hole.
6 posted on 02/21/2006 11:55:22 PM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I also predict that this we're about to see this thing turn into a firestorm.......


7 posted on 02/21/2006 11:56:15 PM PST by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Hey Doofer take your time and give your post a once over before hitting that post icon........[grin]


8 posted on 02/21/2006 11:58:18 PM PST by Doofer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Completely Missing the Point ping!

I like Lileks but he's already behind the cycle on this.

I bet he modifies this position within a week.

9 posted on 02/22/2006 12:01:24 AM PST by Darkwolf377 (atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Doofer

Change your password, you should - Yoda your account has hacked.


10 posted on 02/22/2006 12:01:46 AM PST by Slings and Arrows ("I'd rather hunt with Cheney than drive with Kennedy." --fanfan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
No one's asking and no body's answering just why the U.A.E is pursuing the contract. What is their interest?

If it's purely financial, why shouldn't an American based firm be reaping the benefits?

I've read on these threads that only Haliburton would be capable of fulfilling the contract. I'm guessing the reason for that is capital. But wouldn't that be preferable to foreign interests and alleviate all the concern?

11 posted on 02/22/2006 12:02:56 AM PST by freedom9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cannoneer No. 4
Bazookas don't recoil.

He never said it had a recoil; perhaps it's the lack of recoil that provides the "first clue" ;-)
12 posted on 02/22/2006 12:03:51 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Wait, study, read, reflect.

Please do. This is simply extremely interesting, and Bush's reaction more interesting still. A presidential veto over a matter such as this? Doesn't that strike anyone else as curious?

13 posted on 02/22/2006 12:04:48 AM PST by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
And it certainly doesn’t matter once the President gets all stern on the topic and insists he’ll veto any attempt to keep the deal from going through.

Bush veto something??

Suuuuurrre he will...

14 posted on 02/22/2006 12:05:43 AM PST by liberty_lvr (Those who stand for nothing fall for anything.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Billthedrill
Doesn't that strike anyone else as curious?

I thought he had hocked his veto pen on EBAY 6 years ago. Now what's it going to cost us to buy him a new one?
15 posted on 02/22/2006 12:06:44 AM PST by ARCADIA (Abuse of power comes as no surprise)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Darkwolf377
The UAE is not exactly stuffed stem to stern with pro-American individuals; the idea that the emirs will stand foursquare against infiltration by those who have ulterior motives is the sort of wishful thinking that makes buildings fall and cities empty.

Lather. Rinse. Repeat.

16 posted on 02/22/2006 12:06:45 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle ("It'sTime for Republicans to Start Toeing the Conservative Line, NOT the Other Way Around!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle

It would have been nice if he'd had a clue about his subject matter.


17 posted on 02/22/2006 12:07:03 AM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle
Sounds to me like someone should whisper in GWB's ear that this sounds like firing all the Secret Service agents and outsourcing their jobs to the French Foreign Legion.

On the other hand, it might be instructive to read picrell's thread of 9:45 pm on the 21st. I'm not claiming that that's what is going on here, but it should be considered. (Sorry, I don't know how else to reference that thread.)

18 posted on 02/22/2006 12:07:13 AM PST by de Buillion (Give us your perverts, pedophiles, and sodomites. San Francisco wants YOU!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedom9
If it's purely financial, why shouldn't an American based firm be reaping the benefits?

Because the contracts are OWNED by a British firm and no American company wanted the contracts at their sale price?

19 posted on 02/22/2006 12:09:26 AM PST by jess35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: ARCADIA
The recoil should not be your first clue you grabbed the wrong gun.

Something which does not exist should not be the first clue?

Sounds to me like Lileks doesn't know a recoiless rifle from a rocket launcher.

20 posted on 02/22/2006 12:10:58 AM PST by Cannoneer No. 4 (Our enemies act on ecstatic revelations from their god. We act on the advice of lawyers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-91 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson