Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bolton urges Iran to abandon nukes 'as Libya did'
Jerusalem Post ^ | 2/20/6 | JPOST.COM STAFF

Posted on 02/19/2006 8:50:05 PM PST by SmithL

US Ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton called upon Iran on Sunday to abandon its nuclear weapons development program, thus alleviating the concerns of the international community.

In an interview to The Times, he cited Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi as a precedent, indicating that relations between Libya and the West improved dramatically when the former halted its nuclear program.

As current chairman of the UN Security Council, Bolton warned that international pressure on Iran would intensify so long as it continues pursuing its nuclear ambitions.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Israel; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bolton; iraniannukes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

1 posted on 02/19/2006 8:50:08 PM PST by SmithL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SmithL
As current chairman of the UN Security Council, Bolton ...

Way to go President Bush! ;*)

2 posted on 02/19/2006 8:56:42 PM PST by Just A Nobody (NEVER AGAIN - Support our troops. I *LOVE* my attitude problem! Beware the Enemedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Israel may have to give Iran nukes...about 6 I'd guess.


3 posted on 02/19/2006 9:01:28 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

We must stop that kinda macho swaggering.

Nuking is just not thinkable. We have other means.

Libya is a case in point. It's not perfect.


4 posted on 02/19/2006 9:05:08 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: CBart95
Israel will not let itself be destroyed by Iran, a country that has announced it's intentions.
6 posted on 02/19/2006 9:15:11 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

Lee? What else is new? Those facts have been established for a very long time. It is a dreadful situation.

What is your point?

And just because they have announced their intentions,what do you propose that we do?


7 posted on 02/19/2006 9:21:35 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: CBart95
what do you propose that we do?

Exhaust every option to prevent Iran from going through with developing nukes. Diplomatic, sanctions etc.

If those fail, my point is that Israel may act unilaterally.

8 posted on 02/19/2006 9:27:47 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CBart95
I agree with you CBart95. The "nuke em til they glow" crowd make me laugh.

The minute any country drops a nuke all bets are off and you won't have to worry about paying off your mortgage.

The neo cons and their less educated cheering section represent an embarrassing failure of US foreign policy.

You can mess up a lot of stuff with "transitional warfare" but that doesn't mean you can change anything on the ground.

That takes boots on the ground and the rest of the world has a lot more boots.
9 posted on 02/19/2006 9:38:20 PM PST by beaver fever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

They need to send a video of Saddam being dragged out of the spider hole to the Mullahs. That's what convinced Kaddaffi.


10 posted on 02/19/2006 9:44:13 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

Nah, then the mullahs will show a video of Saddam making a fool out of everyone in court.


11 posted on 02/19/2006 10:07:57 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (History is a work in progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion
They need to send a video of Saddam being dragged out of the spider hole to the Mullahs. That's what convinced Kaddaffi.

Yeah, and look at him now, making a mockery of the judicial system in place over there and of the US. No fear or respect. I can't imagine that they care.

Besides, most of them are either too stupid or too filled with rage to think rationally.

12 posted on 02/19/2006 10:09:50 PM PST by Fruitbat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: ncountylee

No question about it. It's serious and you are correct about Israel...but have you noticed that ,with our support,they have conceded many times to the pressures and atrocities committed against them?

Much of this has to do with powerful diplomatic and economic pressure being applied by the combined free world and it's not all that public or available to the public for many obvious reasons of security and privacy.

Palestine right this moment is facing the loss of monumental funding from Israel if the current threat levels are not ceased soon. Plus they face similar devastating financial support withholding from us as well.

While it all is of considerable interest to average citizens, don't for a moment believe that they ( you or me) have any influence in any part of all of this.

Thus pissing and moaning about "who shot John" is a collossal waste of time and personal effort. and putting in your "2-cents" about Bombing one or the other is "peeing up the rope".

Are you getting any of this?

You'd be far better off getting on your knees and praying to God for his Grace to be shed on all the various participants and for world peace for all.


13 posted on 02/19/2006 10:17:01 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Fruitbat; Cyclopean Squid

I always said they should have followed the Ceausescu model for Saddam's trial.

Ceausescu, the dictator of Romania, was captured, tried, convicted and executed within 24 hrs from his capture.


14 posted on 02/19/2006 10:17:09 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: FairOpinion

I agree, except I would have thrown Saddam to a crowd of Shi'ites and Kurds, and then walked away.


15 posted on 02/19/2006 10:18:58 PM PST by Cyclopean Squid (History is a work in progress)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CBart95

Todays bombs are clean and effective. Not so with those dropped on Japan-yet those cities were rebuilt.

Lots of misinformation on these weapons..granted a weapon of last resort but neverless, would you want to take the chance of these fruitcakes having just one? They'll use it and use it in a second. My guess is they'll use them on the closest target and that would be Israel. At that time it would be all out war with those bombs flying all over the place. Are we as a nation willing to chance that?


16 posted on 02/19/2006 10:19:43 PM PST by crz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: crz

Disabuse yourselfof the notion of "clean nuclear devices". The likely devastation would be utterly indescribable. Radiation levels with several million year half-lives...and far reaching undesirable ,catastrophic effects to neighboring nations and their environment and populations.

This ain't no computer game Pal. This is dreadfully horrible stuff. It is unthinkable. That's why the civilized world is dead against madmen and thugocracies having weapons such as this.

Whether you fancy yourself as some sort of enlightened Liberal or a know-nothing neocon, the devastation won't discriminate along ideological lines and everyone on earth will be directly involved. We are not spectators to all this...we are participants.


17 posted on 02/19/2006 10:33:02 PM PST by CBart95
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: CBart95
IMHO - If Iran does get nukes, no amount of economic or other pressure on Israel will force the Israeli's not to act preemptively.

Will join you in prayer.

18 posted on 02/19/2006 11:04:02 PM PST by ncountylee (Dead terrorists smell like victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: CBart95
"We are not spectators to all this...we are participants."

Yeah, especially if we allow Iran to build and deploy nuclear weapons.

We stop them BEFORE they can deploy them, even if we have to use our own, at least the effects on the North American continent will be minimalized.

If we wait until they are able to 'set one off over Kansas' or ship one into New York or Los Angeles etc., then indeed we are all really screwed.

And since Ahmadinejad has repeatedly promised that he intends to destroy Israel and America, to treat this as anything less than a deadly threat is as stupid as ignoring Al Quaeda in 1988-2000.

19 posted on 02/19/2006 11:17:08 PM PST by LegendHasIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
...indicating that relations between Libya and the West improved dramatically when the former halted its nuclear program.

Bolton is one of Dubya's great successes. A diplomat with a spine. He knows Iran doesn't WANT good relations with the west.

20 posted on 02/19/2006 11:30:06 PM PST by Just Lori (Trying to reason with a liberal is like sucking spaghetti through a straw)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-47 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson