Posted on 02/17/2006 3:18:19 PM PST by voletti
I was thinking the same thing. If any other news source, say, a reputable Western source that actually quotes him saying this, I might start to believe he said something similar to it, but I still won't believe he said anything about anybody actually being convicted of a crime. In the first place, even he's not that stupid. In the second place, the article doesn't say under what European law he said the publishers should be tried, let alone convicted. Convicted of what? He may have said everything else that the article paraphrased him as saying, that sounds just like him sucking up to his audience as per his usual self, but not the part about convicting anybody.
"Convict them of what?"
Thought crimes? For being insensitive to the sensibilities of animals who want to kill us? No wonder all the eurosocialists love him so much!
Nope. I searched for it, could bnot find one.
Paki newspapers have a way with wishing their desires into pseudo-reality and presenting spin as fact.
...that ain't gonna happen, hildabeast can't be held accountable for something she may say. Its gotta be scripted by her staff before she can respond
...or be left by a tree in a park after getting hit by a subway train
This lying moral degenerate, this traitor, this parasite who lives off the money of the public trough is a hypocrite.
Where was his outrage over anti-Christian cartoon, and "works of art" here? Where was his outrage over vicious anti-Jewish cartoons in the Muslim press?
The truth is, if Mohammad was alive today, he wouldn't be consulting with Islamic "moderates" whoever they are, but in a cave with Bin Ladden building bombs.
Apparently the good lawyer Clinton, like so many attorneys in America today, believe the bill of rights is valid only as prescribed the law - the law as they choose to see it at the moment.
Remember, Sandy Berger cut a deal that included loosing his Security clearance for 3 years. That runs out in Feb. 2008 - 11 days after the new President is sworn in...
He can't have it as the Sec. General of the U.N. cannot come from the nations that are permanent members of the Security Council.
Whoa, I knew Clinton was weak, corrupt and narcisstic but this is some evil stuff. He's willing to sacrifice free speech (ie. the ability to cry wolf) at the alter of abject tolerence of anything. All at the point of a gun. Man, I'm just waiting for this guy to grow seven heads with seven crowns. (just kidding...sort of.)
I checked wiki and a sec gen from the 5 permanent members is not strictly forbidden, but would break from tradition.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UN_Secretary-General
Has anyone found another primary source saying that Clinton said conviction?
Someone ought to invite this jackass for a stroll through Ft. Marcy Park.
Bill Clinton is a hazard to the world's health and knows nothing about the things of God or ethical norms.
He is, however, an accomlished liar and a sexual pervert!
There is nothing I can say to this that won't get me banned, or receive a visit from the Feds. I loathe that bastard with every fiber of my being.
And just who gets to determine what constitutes that, Bubba?
I love libs. They're all for free speech as long as it's speech they agree with and/or speech that serves their purposes.
And I wonder if Hillie agrees with her husband on this subject? Oh, Hillie...
Bill, a criminal like yourself, NEVER understands freedom.
Mr. Clinton could have done something about the prosecution of Waco survivors.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.