Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tiny cottages are functional, affordable homes for hurricane survivors
The News-Sentinel ^ | Feb. 16, 2006 | Alan J Heavens

Posted on 02/17/2006 8:08:51 AM PST by Lorianne

ORLANDO, Fla. - At a mere 308 square feet, Katrina Cottage 1 was dwarfed by the big-volume show houses that overwhelmed the recent annual International Builders Show.

And unlike the show houses, which are the stuff dreams are made of, the cottage and others like it represent the new reality for thousands of Mississippi Gulf Coast residents displaced by the hurricane for which it is named.

"This isn't temporary housing," said Sandy Sorlien, a professor of photography at the University of Pennsylvania who is part of the process to rebuild the 11 Mississippi communities torn asunder by Katrina. "It is permanent housing, designed and built to be beautiful and functional."

"It is actually permanent emergency housing," said Marianne Cusato of New York, the designer, who with Sorlien was among more than 100 planning specialists brought to Biloxi, Miss., for almost a week in October by the Mississippi Governor's Commission on Recovery, Rebuilding and Renewal.

Katrina Cottage 1 is just one result of efforts by Gov. Haley Barbour, who said he saw in the hurricane's tragedy a "once-in-a-lifetime opportunity to rebuild this state the right way."

To get the process started quickly, Barbour turned to the Congress of the New Urbanism, a Chicago-based organization dedicated to adapting traditional city- and town-planning principles to modern communities. Leading the New Urbanist charge is the father of neotraditionalism, Miami architect Andres Duany. "Gov. Barbour is serious about doing this right," Duany told an audience at the builders show last month. "He asked me very few things before he told me to go ahead, but three times the governor asked me if I had ever worked in Mississippi or along the state's Gulf Coast, just to make sure there was no conflict of interest." "He wanted a clean process," Duany said.

It left out builders and casino operators, whose presence would have "overwhelmed the process," he said. "It would have been like having an elephant in the room," Sorlien said of the casino owners and residential builders. "They were brought in after the charette (the October brainstorming session) had finished its work." "Most of the builders seem to think what we want to do can be done, or are willing to try," Duany said, indicating that Katrina engendered a spirit of cooperation that has yet to dissipate.

Officials and residents of the 11 Gulf Coast towns hit hardest by the storm participated in the October sessions, Duany said. A report was submitted to Barbour Dec. 31.

"What the commission searched for are recommendations for Mississippi's renewal that are sensible, doable and truly make a difference to our citizens' lives," said commission chairman Jim Barksdale. While not all of those 238 recommendations may be agreeable to everyone, "together they reflect our determination to move toward a renewal of South Mississippi that includes everyone."

Although many communities have embraced the charette's proposals, Biloxi hasn't done so wholeheartedly, said Sorlien, who was head of the building-codes team. "I think it is because Biloxi depended on casinos for its income, and that when the hurricane hit, there were more casinos in the pipeline."

Housing is part of the renewal plan, and the idea behind Katrina Cottage 1 is to provide real, rather than temporary, housing to help people feel as if things are getting back to normal.

"During the charette, Andres talked about the long-term effect FEMA's temporary trailers had on Dade County in the aftermath of Hurricane Andrew," Sorlien said. "Thirteen years after Andrew, people are still living in those trailers. He didn't want that to happen in Mississippi."

The cottage Cusato designed is just one of several included in a "Patternbook for Gulf Coast Neighborhoods" developed by Urban Design Associates of Pittsburgh along the lines of similar plan books that exist for towns such as Celebration and Seaside in Florida and the Kentlands in Maryland. Some of the other cottages are larger - one is 800 square feet - but all are designed in keeping with the vernacular architecture of South Mississippi.

Cusato said her cottage, a downsized version of the Mississippi coastal-style house, is designed for both residents and emergency workers as an alternative to the FEMA trailer, but for about the same price - $35,000 - "once the cottage goes into mass production." The house can be manufactured or modular, panelized or built on site with traditional construction.

Unlike the FEMA trailer, the cottage (there are three versions) and other houses that will be offered "are designed to withstand hurricanes, since we know that they will continue to occur," Cusato said. "It is a secure house that you can live in and build from," she said, designed either to be the first piece of a larger permanent house or to be placed at the back of a lot and turned into a guest house or other outbuilding after a permanent house is completed. One of the cottage's three rooms is the front porch. "It is designed to be used and be comfortable, and comes with storage," Cusato said.

The porch opens to a combination living room and dining room, then to the kitchen, "which defines the space between that room and the bedroom, which has bunk beds for the family with storage underneath," she said. "We use every inch of space in that house. They are not large spaces, because we've found that people tend to gravitate to small spaces because they are secure and cozy."

Cusato compared her cottage with the 10,000-square-foot New American Home and other large-scale show houses that were open to those attending the builders show, saying that with that much space, "those houses aren't planned at all well."

"Sarah Susanka (author of `The Not So Big House') has proved that we can live in smaller spaces as long as we use them well," Cusato said. "Properly designed and planned, a 1,000-square-foot house can meet a family's needs perfectly, whether it is permanent or emergency housing."

That's why Cusato is creating a series of these cottages, including a two-bedroom house of almost 400 square feet. She's been surprised at the interest Katrina Cottage 1 generated.

"Developer after developer came up to me, asking for the plans so they could build the cottage as beach-front housing or in ski resorts," she said.

"I insisted that this is, first and foremost, emergency housing for the people of the Gulf Coast, but that once their needs have been met, I would consider it. "Then it hit me that what I had done was to come up with a prototype that could take off as a new way of building," she said. "The irony is that these builders never realized that affordable housing can be attractive."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; US: Alabama; US: Louisiana; US: Mississippi
KEYWORDS: architecture
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last
Some Katrina survivors would balk at anything less than a 10,000 square foot replacement home.
1 posted on 02/17/2006 8:08:53 AM PST by Lorianne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

Comment #2 Removed by Moderator

To: Lorianne

300 sq. ft. is very tiny. A family could not live for very long in that small space. My kitchen is larger than that.


3 posted on 02/17/2006 8:12:31 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

None of these survivors should be enriched as a result of this tragedy. So many in the 9th ward lived in total destitution brought about by their own neglect if not outright malicious intent. And for us to spend $200,000 to "get them back what they lost" is ludicrous.

Whatever they get will be a marked improvement from the ghettos and slums they engineered for themselves.


4 posted on 02/17/2006 8:13:55 AM PST by AbeKrieger (Hey Muslims - time to stop the MuhamMadness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Baditude
"It is a secure house that you can live in and build from," she said, designed either to be the first piece of a larger permanent house or to be placed at the back of a lot and turned into a guest house or other outbuilding after a permanent house is completed.

Seems like a great idea.

A_R

5 posted on 02/17/2006 8:15:53 AM PST by arkady_renko
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
Cottages in Carmel, CA are worth a fortune!
6 posted on 02/17/2006 8:16:39 AM PST by sully777 (What would Brian Boitano do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mariabush

A family can live in 1,000 square feet, so we offer 400? Who thinks like that? And what do these cost compared to trailors which are already built and have been refined over 50 years?


7 posted on 02/17/2006 8:19:55 AM PST by ClaireSolt (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mariabush
300 sq. ft. is very tiny. A family could not live for very long in that small space. My kitchen is larger than that.

Quite the encouragement to get out and work on affording something better. Excellent.

8 posted on 02/17/2006 8:22:10 AM PST by 50sDad (Racist: Anyone who is winning an argument with a Liberal.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sully777

How much does it rent for? It's adorable, would love to vacation there for a week. Beautiful area.


9 posted on 02/17/2006 8:22:48 AM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

http://www.iwprgroup.com/katrinacottage.htm


10 posted on 02/17/2006 8:24:17 AM PST by Search4Truth (The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 50sDad
One would surely hope that would happen. My guess is that they would just continue to live there, invite 5 other families to move in with them, then gripe that the Fed's were not doing enough to help them.
11 posted on 02/17/2006 8:24:52 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: stopem

Opps never mind just saw the rental per week in the description, not bad for two couples to split the rent.


12 posted on 02/17/2006 8:24:53 AM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: ClaireSolt

Actually, a family of 5 or 6 can live in less that 1,000 sq. ft. A little tight, but it can be done.


13 posted on 02/17/2006 8:26:41 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

If I could get a decent-sized lot, I'd have one built. The price is right... :-)


14 posted on 02/17/2006 8:28:29 AM PST by LongElegantLegs (Going armed to the terror of the public.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Search4Truth

The cost is $45,000 per home. Much less than what FEMA paid for the unused trailers but a lot for that small a space.


15 posted on 02/17/2006 8:29:31 AM PST by stopem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne
If you had to rebuild your house, but wanted to stay 'on site, which would you prefer, a FEMA trailer or a nice little cottage that would STAY on the property when the house was done? VOILA! Instant guest cottage, or even better, Vacation Rental property! Towns will have to make sure that the zoning laws are adjusted to permit this, but I think it's a great idea!

I know my sister would probably like something like this. She actually had three houses on her property that were all destroyed. The main house, closest to the water, but 15' above it, was concrete block, and was washed away. They rented out the home nearer the road, and had a third little cottage between them that she used as a guest house. A Katrina Cottage would suit her needs quite nicely while they're re-building.

16 posted on 02/17/2006 8:29:34 AM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stopem

If you scroll down, you'll see the price range. I'm not involved; I merely googled Carmel cottages and found this. Carmel is one of the most beautiful towns in the USA. Be warned: Bring a lot of cash for the week.

$325-400/per night
$1600-3000/per week

I guess the price range depends on the season.


17 posted on 02/17/2006 8:29:45 AM PST by sully777 (What would Brian Boitano do?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: sully777
I saw a house on one of those flip it shows that sold for 354,000 in a not too nice neighborhood in So. Calif.

This house was covered on the inside in mold and had to be completely gutted and redone.

The rental on this cottage in Carmel probably was not too bad at all.
18 posted on 02/17/2006 8:34:15 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ("Over there, over there, We won't be back 'til it's over Over there.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Sound like it's the size of one of a small hotel suite, Embassy Suites for example.


19 posted on 02/17/2006 8:41:35 AM PST by jimfree (Freep and Ye shall find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

It's bigger than my flat in Taipei, and better (and larger) than either base housing I had in Kosovo.


20 posted on 02/17/2006 8:43:48 AM PST by JosephW (The world must stop Mad Mo and his orcs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-130 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson