Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

MPR in salary disclosure flap - forgoes state money that hinges on revealing top salaries.
Minneapolis StarTribune (aka The Red Star) ^ | 2/15/06 | Pat Doyle - Staff Reporter

Posted on 02/15/2006 6:35:49 AM PST by MplsSteve

While it's conducting a fund drive for listener contributions, Minnesota Public Radio hasn't claimed $190,000 in state funds that are available under a new condition that it reveal salaries exceeding $100,000.

Why the disclosure? Rep. Marty Seifert, who pushed for the law requiring MPR to disclose employee salaries of more than $100,000, said he did so because he was bothered by the salary of president and CEO William Kling, above. Kling’s total compensation from MPR and its parent company is more than $500,000.

(Excerpt) Read more at startribune.com ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Minnesota
KEYWORDS: minnesotapublicradio; salaries
Interesting article. I'm not sure how many other states do this.

My distrust of Minnesota (or National) Public Radio aside, I have no problem with demanding to know what exec pay/compensation are - especially if public funds are being used.

I'm not sure why MPR is resisting this - other than the salaries are too damned large and they don't want to disclose them.

Opinions or comments anyone?

1 posted on 02/15/2006 6:35:53 AM PST by MplsSteve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

$500,000 for a socialist? Wow! It must cost a lot to be a many of the little people in the land of 10,000 lakes!


2 posted on 02/15/2006 6:37:24 AM PST by pikachu (I must be be built upside down -- my nose runs and my feet smell!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

It seems to me that they must figure the bad PR they would receive in disclosing the salaries would cost them more money in private donations than the $190,000 they could be getting from the state. Makes you wonder.


3 posted on 02/15/2006 6:52:17 AM PST by vastrightwc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve
Does anybody know if this means that MPR is forgoing all state money by doing this, or just a particular grant?
4 posted on 02/15/2006 7:06:39 AM PST by inquest (If you favor any legal status for illegal aliens, then do not claim to be in favor of secure borders)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Having followed this for a number of years, I can assure you that MPR is one of the biggest scams in the country. Why the State of Minnesota continues to fund this operation is beyond my comprehension.


5 posted on 02/15/2006 8:28:19 AM PST by newcthem (Use Allah urinal cakes!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

MPR is the local equivalent of the U.N.
The whole operation should be shut down and defunded.
Reminds me of being forced to be a member of a union, having to pay dues, and seeing them support candidates that you totally disagree with.
If it won't support itself, it needs to go away!


6 posted on 02/15/2006 4:23:15 PM PST by Fireone (Homeland security is 10,000 rounds of ammo and 10 cords of dry firewood.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson