Better To Be Nuked Than To Bomb Iran?

Right Wing News ^ | February 14, 2006 | John Hawkins

[stuckinloozeeana]

they voted for a war before they voted against it

[OKSooner]

Ooh! Ooh! I've found a new email caption, courtesy of your tagline!

[The Sons of Liberty]

Better To Be Nuked Than To Bomb Iran?

This shows the type of morons the "Clintoon News Network" (CNN) attracts.

[databoss]

I am sure you can find one at your next Trekkie convention. It will be the nerd droid in the corner with the glasses...

[airborne]

If we get nuked, you can count on a police state for the foreseeable future.

And all bets are off as to the weaponry we respond with and who we use them on.

[airborne]

Lots of Democrats will die because they live in the target zone of these terrorists...and I can't understand why they are so willing to become a casualty...

And that'll really hurt the Dem candidates chances of getting elected. ;^)

[Decepticon]

I am sure you can find one at your next Trekkie convention. It will be the nerd droid in the corner with the glasses...

I wouldn't know.....then again I don't hang out on websites correcting spelling and grammar.....professor.

[johnny7]

The longer you wait to deal with Iran... the more of a retaliation they will be able to dispense. Much like Iraq moved their WMD's... Iran has surely developed the same or more-elaborate strategy. The longer you wait... the worse the scenario can become.

[Antoninus]

Here is proof positive that we are in the midst of morons.

Indeed. We live in a soft country surrounded by soft people who want to take the path of least resistance in everything. They liked the Clinton presidency because he was much like them. The hardest thing he ever had to do was keep his "intern problem" from getting him knocked out of office. When it came to a real shooting war against a dangerous enemy, Clinton couldn't be bothered.

The sad thing is, these weak people are going to get us nuked by electing weak leaders. And when they do, they'll say it's the fault of those who tried to protect us.

[Decepticon]

The sad thing is, these weak people are going to get us nuked by electing weak leaders. And when they do, they'll say it's the fault of those who tried to protect us.

Well said.

[Max in Utah]

Impressive......but what I really need is a droid that understands the binary languages of moisture vaporators. ...

Good one, Luke. :)

[Max in Utah]

If they test a weapon in this manner, given the geological instability of their country, they might just destroy themselves. Any thoughts?

Yes. They should place the test on hold until they see livestock acting restless and snakes leaving their burrows. Additional points for detonating at the peak of the full moon.

[Decepticon]

Good one, Luke. :)

Thanks.....I was afraid no one got it......

[BootsOfEscaping]

Now with the administration outsourcing control of our ports to the United Arab Emirates, getting nuked is just a matter of time. When we do get nuked..what will the libs say then? Am I the only one that gets the feeling that a lot of the looney left really wants the US to get nuked to "teach us a lesson"? They want us to lose the war...so its not much of a stretch to say they want us to get nuked. Friggin morons. The brainwashing runs deep.

[expatguy]

LMFAO!!!

What does this have to do with Cheney being drunk and shooting someone????!!! Firearm Malfunction!!!

LOL - America's worst enemy is America

An American Expat in Southeast Asia

[HiTech RedNeck]

When we do get nuked..what will the libs say then?

It's the Republicans' fault. Obviously.

[MaDeuce]

"Learn how to spell "poll" before authoring one and unleashing it on the public."

Damm!! I knew I should have paid more attention in 2nd grade spelling instead of beating up on other kids.

[databoss]

That should be damn...it's never too late to learn how to spell, nor is it too late to be civil towards others.