So the pictures were tainted? The guy is incompetent? The pictures were unclear?
If the guy closely examined the photos of the alleged "victim's" face and found no evidence of the alleged "tape marks," which look to be central to this case, the victim (the one doing time for crimes he did not commit) was railroaded.
"So the pictures were tainted? The guy is incompetent? The pictures were unclear? "
We don't know. This article is blatantly one-sided and no one seems to have found the state's evidence. Not to mention, the expert was hired by the defense to analyze 15 year old photographs.