Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Binkmeister
The question is whether Apprendi is simply a new procedural rule, which it appears to be, in which case it's long been the law that it need not apply retroactively.

The issue I have here is not with the justice or injustice of the sentence, it's the fact that every time I try to do a little digging on this article, it turns out that the article is blatantly misrepresenting the facts of the case. That makes me real suspicious about the parts that I haven't done any digging on.

156 posted on 02/09/2006 9:44:52 AM PST by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 152 | View Replies ]


To: Senator Bedfellow

"The issue I have here is not with the justice or injustice of the sentence, it's the fact that every time I try to do a little digging on this article, it turns out that the article is blatantly misrepresenting the facts of the case."

Really? You have examples I presume?


158 posted on 02/09/2006 9:55:30 AM PST by monday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson