Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: george76

That's what I thought. But then why isn't Alaska higher up on the list?


8 posted on 02/08/2006 6:30:13 PM PST by conservative in nyc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: conservative in nyc

Alaska, which gets much of it revenue from oil production, saw its state tax receipts drop 1 percent, to $2,035 per person.

Oil revenue helped Alaska spend $12,294 per person in 2004, far more than any other state.


15 posted on 02/08/2006 6:37:45 PM PST by george76 (Ward Churchill : Fake Indian, Fake Scholarship, and Fake Art)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: conservative in nyc
That's what I thought. But then why isn't Alaska higher up on the list?

Probably because Wyoming has a smaller population than Alaska. (around 500k vs 700k). That means more tax $ per head.

30 posted on 02/09/2006 12:04:21 PM PST by LexBaird ("I'm not questioning your patriotism, I'm answering your treason."--JennysCool)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson