To: NormsRevenge
My bet is that what was given to the house committee has been tagged so that whoever leaks the information will be known.
5 posted on
02/08/2006 4:16:14 PM PST by
EQAndyBuzz
("We don't need POLITICIANS...we need STATESMEN.")
To: EQAndyBuzz
11 posted on
02/08/2006 4:17:06 PM PST by
Howlin
(Why don't you just report the news, instead of what might be the news? - Donald Rumsfeld 1/25/2006)
To: EQAndyBuzz
My bet is that what was given to the house committee has been tagged so that whoever leaks the information will be known.Please God they had enough brains to do that. I'm sure the NYT is frantically rushing all of the details to print even as I post.
20 posted on
02/08/2006 4:19:59 PM PST by
CFC__VRWC
("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
To: EQAndyBuzz
The damage has been done. Any benefit the program may have had has been severely comprimised by the leak to the NYT
that the program exists.The only potential benefit that can be salvaged out of the program is to establish who the leakers were, (I'm betting on Sens. Rockerfeller and/or Leahy), prosecute them to the full extent of the law and throw the fear of instant prison time into those who would comprimise other programs for political gain.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson