Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

VIDEO: ALAN DERSHOWITZ GETS IT (cartoons and the press)
Michelle Malkin ^

Posted on 02/08/2006 9:39:07 AM PST by hipaatwo

European readers Brian A. and Kenneth M. have passed along links to an excellent interview with Alan Dershowitz that aired this week on Danish television. I don't agree with much of what Dershowitz espouses, but on many crucial War on Terror-related issues he is dead-on--as he is here on the Cartoon Jihad and the craven media. I think his appearance dovetails nicely with the points I tried to make last night on Hannity and Colmes.

dershowitz.jpg

Download and watch the video in:
Windows (.wmv file)
Quicktime

Partial transcript...

[Responding to a question about his reaction to the Danish embassy torchings:]

It's great hypocrisy on the part of those doing the burning, because these are some of the same people who read voraciously much worse cartoons directed at Christians and Jews and Americans and Israel. Deeply, deeply, offensive anti-Christian and anti-Semitic cartoons are a staple out of Gaza every week, and suddenly, when Mohammed is offended, they're prepared to burn down embassies and create this kind of havoc. It is extraordinary hypocrisy.

[On the American media's unwillingness to show the cartoons:]

...You can't have a story about a cartoon without seeing the cartoon. In fact, when you see the cartoons published by the Danish newspapers, they are mild in comparison with what's published every day in Islamic fundamentalists newspapers and in Syrian newspapers, in Egyptian newspapers, in Saudi Arabian newspapers. So you have to see the cartoon to get a sense of how outrageous these attacks on the Danish embassy [are] and the hypocrisy across the Middle East is.

[In response to a question seeking an explanation for the US media's decision not to publish the cartoons:]

...I was informed yesterday that Time magazine was seriously considering publishing the cartoons. That would take an act of courage.

CNN has shown no courage. It claims it won't publish the cartoons because they're offensive. But they have published previous cartoons that are offensive. The fact is, they're frightened. The fact is, that this kind of religious and intellectual terrorism is working. It is persuading journalists who would otherwise cover this story with the cartoons to back away--not on ideological reasons or not for reasons of protecting or preserving integrity or anything of that kind, but out of physical and economic fear. This is economic, physical terrorism directed at journalists and it is working. They have succeeded in the United States. They have failed in parts of Europe, but they have succeeded in the United States.

...When the burning down of embassies and the fear of fatwas and physical and economic retaliation are what determines the policy, it means that the terrorists have won. And the United States and other European countries have a policy: Never give in to terrorism. Well, they're now giving in to terrorism by not publishing these cartoons--not because they're offensive, they publish plenty of offensive cartoons, but because they are frightened and because they lack the courage to confront this kind of terrorist threat.

Bravo, bravo. He gets it. If only more journalists could think as lucidly as Dershowitz does on this matter.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: cartoon; cartoons; denmark; dershowitz; europe; muslim
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

1 posted on 02/08/2006 9:39:12 AM PST by hipaatwo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Bumperoo


2 posted on 02/08/2006 9:43:26 AM PST by roaddog727 (P=3/8 A. or, P=plenty...............)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
Dershowitz may be a horrific liberal at times, but he certainly has this right.

CNN is populated by cowards.

3 posted on 02/08/2006 9:50:33 AM PST by Reactionary (The Moonbats Need an Enema)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Has Fox shown the cartoons?


4 posted on 02/08/2006 9:51:04 AM PST by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
I was informed yesterday that Time magazine was seriously considering publishing the cartoons. That would take an act of courage.
How about that would take an act of God?
5 posted on 02/08/2006 9:51:08 AM PST by Andy from Beaverton (I only vote Republican to stop the Democrats)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Is Dershowitz actually Jewish or does he play one on TV?


6 posted on 02/08/2006 9:52:21 AM PST by zarf (It's time for a college football playoff system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Alan Dershowitz has also noted the painfully obvious fact the the US Constitution doesn't provide for a right to abortion on demand and says the SCOTUS was wrong which, for a liberal, is pretty astonishing.


7 posted on 02/08/2006 9:53:21 AM PST by Spok (Est omnis de civilitate.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

He does have his moments of clarity on occasion.


8 posted on 02/08/2006 9:54:51 AM PST by nuffsenuff (Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred

Michelle showed the cartoons on Hannity and Colmes last night.


9 posted on 02/08/2006 9:57:18 AM PST by Pyro7480 (Sancte Joseph, terror daemonum, ora pro nobis!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Pyro7480

Thanks


10 posted on 02/08/2006 9:58:56 AM PST by trashcanbred (Anti-social and anti-socialist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

Well, even though a blind hog finds an acorn now and then, Alan Dirt-for-wits will never find credibility, at least for me.


11 posted on 02/08/2006 10:02:30 AM PST by meandog (For lurking Moo-slew-ems: Sahada: "That which Islam calls "Allah" is Satan and Mohammad is his pig!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nuffsenuff

He's still wrong to combine economic and physical in the same sentence. Economic "terrorism" as he calls it, is not terrorism at all, boycott something economically is a form of freedom of expression. It's the threat of physical violence that is terrorism.


12 posted on 02/08/2006 10:03:18 AM PST by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

His comments are summarized in the latest TIME, which in fact says it will not run the cartoons.


13 posted on 02/08/2006 10:05:23 AM PST by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Truthsearcher

I said "moments" didn't I?


14 posted on 02/08/2006 10:05:51 AM PST by nuffsenuff (Don't get stuck on Stupid - General Russ Honore Sept 21, 2005)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

The American MSM has been castrated by Muslim intellectual terrorism.

The MSM talks big s!it when it comes to bashing Bush, the Iraq war, and Christians, but they have no guts to take on Muslim fanatics.


15 posted on 02/08/2006 10:07:52 AM PST by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo
It's great hypocrisy on the part of those doing the burning, because these are some of the same people who read voraciously much worse cartoons directed at Christians and Jews and Americans and Israel. Deeply, deeply, offensive anti-Christian and anti-Semitic cartoons are a staple out of Gaza every week, and suddenly, when Mohammed is offended, they're prepared to burn down embassies and create this kind of havoc. It is extraordinary hypocrisy.

Actually, it is hypocrisy in a social sense but not in a religious sense for them.

Hypocrisy is saying you are actively doing one thing while actively doing the opposite. Actually, they are being quite consistent in their continued support of their "prophet".

The extent to which they take it should raise flags for all.

The lawyer gets it wrong yet again.
16 posted on 02/08/2006 10:13:42 AM PST by ConservativeMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trashcanbred

Nope


17 posted on 02/08/2006 10:16:02 AM PST by ThisLittleLightofMine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

Great point! It would be hypocrisy if they believed in a free press, but they don't.


18 posted on 02/08/2006 10:26:02 AM PST by aquila48
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Reactionary
"CNN is populated by cowards."


Cowards?

I hear, more and more, the word "cowards" associated with the Left.

I may be wrong, but these people aren't "cowards" in the true meaning of the word. They are activist enemies of the United States.


The Left, meaning the entire alphabet media, all Leftist publications, the Democrat Party, half the U.S. Congress, etc. etc., are aiding and abetting the enemies of the United States.


Cowards are "no-where men". They have no opinion. Push them, they walk away. Insult their wife, they vacate the area, with or without her.




"He's a real nowhere Man,
Sitting in his Nowhere Land,
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.

Doesn't have a point of view,
Knows not where he's going to,
Isn't he a bit like you and me?

Nowhere Man, please listen,
You don't know what you're missing,
Nowhere Man, the world is at your command.

He's as blind as he can be,
Just sees what he wants to see,
Nowhere Man can you see me at all?

Doesn't have a point of view,
Knows not where he's going to,
Isn't he a bit like you and me?

Nowhere Man, don't worry,
Take your time, don't hurry,
Leave it all 'till somebody else
lends you a hand.

He's a real Nowhere Man,
Sitting in his Nowhere Land,
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.
"





19 posted on 02/08/2006 10:28:23 AM PST by G.Mason (Duty, Honor, Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: hipaatwo

I had a genuine dislike for Dershowitz until 9/11....when he came 100% for torturing terrorists to protect American lives.


20 posted on 02/08/2006 10:29:58 AM PST by KenmcG414 (wHAT'ST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-35 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson