Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dson7_ck1249

What I don't understand is why anyone would want to take the authority away from the President to protect us all and give that ultimate authority to some judge who says yes or no.


4 posted on 02/07/2006 6:56:58 AM PST by SR 50 (Larry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SR 50
What I don't understand is why anyone would want to take the authority away from the President to protect us all and give that ultimate authority to some judge who says yes or no.

Because that's what the Constitution says. There's a reason we don't grant absolute power to the President.

So where was all this "the President needs to wiretap everyone" hype when Clinton was in office and the World Trade Center was first attacked?

12 posted on 02/07/2006 7:36:15 AM PST by NoCountyIncomeTax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: SR 50
..In case you end up with someone... gung-ho... in charge.

And would the president not just "say yes or no"? Are there any other answers to that question?

And your dictionary doesn't include "Gung-ho". I'm upset...
21 posted on 02/07/2006 8:30:51 AM PST by 12watch (British and proud(ish) of it...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson