Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

ISRAEL back strikes at IRAN's N-SITES
The Times Of India ^ | Monday: 02/06/2006

Posted on 02/07/2006 4:35:12 AM PST by IrishMike

WASHINGTON: With the IRAN nuclear imbroglio showing no sign of an early resolution, Israeli defence experts have claimed that their air force has the ability "to cripple" Tehran's nuclear programme by striking at the "weak" spots. Hitting and destroyong two or three key facilities would probably be sufficient, Shlomo Brom, a former Israeli armed forces chief of strategic planning was quoted as saying to Newsweek. He identified the Natanz uranium enrichment complex and the conversion plant at Esfahan as critical targets.

(Excerpt) Read more at timesofindia.indiatimes.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: iran; jihad; terrorism
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

1 posted on 02/07/2006 4:35:13 AM PST by IrishMike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Well just be sure to also take out their airforce and Navy on the way home....


2 posted on 02/07/2006 4:39:55 AM PST by AZRepublican ("The degree in which a measure is necessary can never be a test of the legal right to adopt it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

How about a high altitude air burst nuke, knocking out their entire electrical grid, just to show them what they're developing.


3 posted on 02/07/2006 4:46:49 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

"How about a high altitude air burst nuke, knocking out their entire electrical grid, just to show them what they're developing."

would that knock out the power in bunkers 60 ft deep with 6ft concrete ceiling?

I really don't know so I am asking


4 posted on 02/07/2006 5:00:23 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sure_fine

I don't think anyone knows but, it's worth a try. It really depends on whether they have off-grid underground systems. Regardless, everything above ground, would be fried.


5 posted on 02/07/2006 5:05:52 AM PST by wolfcreek
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Nothing like an ex-Israeli Armed Forces Chief telling the Iranians where the strikes might come.

I am pretty sure the Iranians already know ,but why tip them off. Maybe he is giving out disinformation, who knows?

Wouldnt it be better if retired Military and Presidents just STFU and let the current people in office run the war?


6 posted on 02/07/2006 5:10:50 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike
Hitting only '2 or 3' of their nuclear sites will be like smacking a hornets nest and sticking around to watch. We saw what happened after Gulf War I... Saddam was allowed to stay and the boil festered.

I don't think Israel can afford a half-measure solution.

7 posted on 02/07/2006 5:11:06 AM PST by johnny7 (“Iuventus stultorum magister”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Well, what are you waiting for, Shlomo?


8 posted on 02/07/2006 5:12:24 AM PST by flada (Posting in a manner reminiscent of Jen-gis Kahn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

I don't put a lot of stock into reports from the Times of India... but...

If Israel can take out 2 or 3, then between them and us, we should be able to clean-up pretty well.


9 posted on 02/07/2006 5:15:59 AM PST by TheBattman (Islam (and liberalism)- the cult of Satan and a Cancer on Society)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Can they really afford to have another "Chernobyl",in the middle east?


10 posted on 02/07/2006 5:17:01 AM PST by SR 50 (Larry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfcreek

true, they shouldn't live in a time that exceeds their socially civilized capacity


11 posted on 02/07/2006 5:18:55 AM PST by sure_fine (*not one to over kill the thought process*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: sgtbono2002

Maybe they are setting expectations with an eye to
using some altogether unexpected weapon or method..

I am convinced that the comments are deliberate and
orchestrated.


12 posted on 02/07/2006 5:20:11 AM PST by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

Any bets that Israel is trying to get Iran to take steps to protect the most critical facilities so they can gather more intelligence on where to strike and get the most BANG! for the buck?


13 posted on 02/07/2006 5:21:11 AM PST by trebb ("I am the way... no one comes to the Father, but by me..." - Jesus in John 14:6 (RSV))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

A clever tactic on the part of the mullahs would be to talk about the success they've already had in developing things like, oh, suitcase nukes and compact dirty bombs, and implying that a few of them might already be in Zion just waiting for a martyr to push their buttons. If Israel had to worry about atoms that are already in place going boom should they attack Iran, things get even dicier.


14 posted on 02/07/2006 6:10:43 AM PST by MajorityOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike; All

Have you all noticed that the Times of India seems to have very good sources inside the Israeli government and military..wonder what that signifies? Could India possibly serve as a back door staging point for the IAF? Anything that cripples the crazies in Iran also hurts the crazies in Pakistan...


15 posted on 02/07/2006 8:23:22 AM PST by ken5050 (Ann Coulter needs to have children ASAP to pass on her gene pool....any volunteers?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SR 50

Better it be on Iran's soil than in Alabama....


16 posted on 02/07/2006 8:51:16 AM PST by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: IrishMike

I think maybe Israel has abdicated this time around. All the discussion in Israel and the threats and implied threats are a strong indication that it won't happen. Israel would not be talking about it if Israel had decided to actually do the thing. The politicians there are trying to get someone else to do it.


17 posted on 02/07/2006 8:56:05 AM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arthurus
"Israel would not be talking about it if Israel had decided to actually do the thing."

I don't know if that still holds today. After all, we did plenty of talking before we went after Hussein. Also, it certainly appears to be the case that the Iranians know something is going to happen.

18 posted on 02/07/2006 9:19:10 AM PST by Reactionary (The Moonbats Need an Enema)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: ridesthemiles

Seems that DC sniper Mohammed trained at an Alabama terrorist camp.


19 posted on 02/07/2006 9:32:23 AM PST by txhurl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: MajorityOfOne

If there are such suitcase nukes in Israel they will, at some point be used and Israel knows that. Such an anouncement by Iran might well precipitate an Israeli attack that seems unlikely right now given all the talk about it that the Israelis are doing.


20 posted on 02/07/2006 12:30:29 PM PST by arthurus (Better to fight them OVER THERE than over here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson