Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SandRat
Having been an Air Force officer, the words of an Air Force general in support of his boss don't do a lot for me. These guys are reflex arse-kissers.

Is it really true that FISA paperwork is so onerous that it can't reasonably be expected to be completed in 72 hours? If so, where was the administration's initiative to amend the law?

And what's with "The president's terrorist surveillance program?" I thought it was the government's program; what's next, giant pictures of GWB lining Pennsylvania Avenue?

10 posted on 02/05/2006 3:34:11 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Grut

You were an AF Officer; how long in and what was your rank when you got out?


11 posted on 02/05/2006 3:42:15 PM PST by SandRat (Duty, Honor, Country. What else needs to be said?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: Grut

"Is it really true that FISA paperwork is so onerous that it can't reasonably be expected to be completed in 72 hours?"

===

And where do you think a terrorist will be in 72 hrs? Possibly in a plane aimed at the Capitol.


The 911 Commission itself said that FISA is too slow.


9/11 Commission: FISA Court Too Slow


http://www.newsmax.com/archives/ic/2006/1/30/90457.shtml?s=icp


As noted on yesterday's "Meet the Press" by National Review Online reporter Byron York, 9/11 Commission Report clearly states:

"The FISA application process continues to be long and slow. Requests for approvals are overwhelming the ability of the system to process them and to conduct a surveillance.”

In a passage not noted by Mr. York, the Commission blasts the FISA process even more harshly, complaining:
"The 'wall' between criminal and intelligence investigations apparently caused agents to be less aggressive than they might otherwise have been in pursuing Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) surveillance powers in counterterrorism investigations.

"Moreover, the FISA approval process involved multiple levels of review, which also discouraged agents from using such surveillance. Many agents also told us that the process for getting FISA packages approved at FBI Headquarters and the Department of Justice was incredibly lengthy and inefficient.

"Several FBI agents added that, prior to 9/11, FISA-derived intelligence information was not fully exploited but was collected primarily to justify continuing the surveillance."

Since the media generally regards the 9/11 Commission as the ultimate authority on such matters, we trust reporters will now stop insisting that the FISA process was wholly adequate to keep America safe from terrorists.


12 posted on 02/05/2006 3:47:32 PM PST by FairOpinion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson