[dixiechick2000]

I heard that it's delayed until Jan., 2007.

What's up with that?

[Anti-Bubba182]

I have no idea. I was shocked that there would be such a delay.

[woofie]

This vast web of lies is so vast that a whole bunch of lawyers will spend a whole bunch of money proving nada and it will take a whole bunch of time


I wanna know when do they tell us if Rove is off the hook?

[cgk]

The delay was apparently from Libby's lawyer having a schedule conflict in the September 2006, so the judge pushed it to Jan 2007.

That's just about far enough away for everyone to forget and not wonder what happened so they can bury the news about the "not guilty" or similar verdict.

[Jaysun]

I heard that it's delayed until Jan., 2007.
What's up with that?

Dems hoping to make hay of it in 2008?

[thedilg]

[I heard that it's delayed until Jan., 2007.

What's up with that?]

A possible answer is that the trial will be closer to the 08 presidential elections.

[bcsco]

"I heard that it's delayed until Jan., 2007.

What's up with that?"

Fox News reported Friday that the judge wanted to schedule the trial for September but Libby's attorney had a scheduling conflict so it was scheduled for January, '07.

[MarkL]

I heard that it's delayed until Jan., 2007.

What's up with that?

It's to make sure that the press has plenty of time to try to link republicans to the "scandal" in the lead up to the 2006 congressional elections, as well as giving plenty of lead time for the 2008 presidential elections.

Mark